Romantic relationships on a daily scale: 14 state scales for romantic relationship constructs

The nature of romantic relationships is dynamic, with partners encountering different situations daily. To capture these experiences, we developed state scales for multiple daily assessments of affective (e.g., relationship anxiety), cognitive (e.g., relationship self-efficacy), and behavioral constructs (e.g., relationship behaviors) relevant to romantic relationships. The scale development process involved a pilot study and a main study, both including baseline trait assessments and an experience sampling phase with five questionnaires/day for 10 days. We adapted existing trait scales following recommendations for state item development. The scales were improved based on the results of multilevel confirmatory factor analyses (MCFA) from a pilot study ( N = 95, N$_{obs}$ = 2,807–3,414). In the main study ( N = 258, N$_{obs}$ = 5,700–9,486), we evaluated the final state scales. MCFA results demonstrated good within-person reliabilities (ω$_{within}$ = .72–.94) for each scale. Scale validities were confirmed by correlations with corresponding trait measures and assessments reported by the participants’ partners. Within-person intercorrelations and MCFA analyses including second-order factors further supported the scales’ validity. As a result, we present 14 reliable and valid state scales measuring relevant constructs in romantic relationships. We discuss problems with discriminant validity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-291721
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Romantic relationships on a daily scale: 14 state scales for romantic relationship constructs

Marie Hennecke, Veronika Brandstätter, Miriam Pfister, Melanie Naumann
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
article

Romantic relationships on a daily scale: 14 state scales for romantic relationship constructs

Marie Hennecke, Veronika Brandstätter, Miriam Pfister, Melanie Naumann
article en

Abstract

The nature of romantic relationships is dynamic, with partners encountering different situations daily. To capture these experiences, we developed state scales for multiple daily assessments of affective (e.g., relationship anxiety), cognitive (e.g., relationship self-efficacy), and behavioral constructs (e.g., relationship behaviors) relevant to romantic relationships. The scale development process involved a pilot study and a main study, both including baseline trait assessments and an experience sampling phase with five questionnaires/day for 10 days. We adapted existing trait scales following recommendations for state item development. The scales were improved based on the results of multilevel confirmatory factor analyses (MCFA) from a pilot study ( N = 95, N$_{obs}$ = 2,807–3,414). In the main study ( N = 258, N$_{obs}$ = 5,700–9,486), we evaluated the final state scales. MCFA results demonstrated good within-person reliabilities (ω$_{within}$ = .72–.94) for each scale. Scale validities were confirmed by correlations with corresponding trait measures and assessments reported by the participants’ partners. Within-person intercorrelations and MCFA analyses including second-order factors further supported the scales’ validity. As a result, we present 14 reliable and valid state scales measuring relevant constructs in romantic relationships. We discuss problems with discriminant validity.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.