Abstract PS5-10-02: Evaluating the impact of educational materials about biomarker testing for patients with metastatic breast cancer

Abstract Background: As part of the No One Missed Campaign, Living Beyond Breast Cancer created educational materials about the importance of biomarker testing for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Materials were created in English and culturally adapted to Spanish with input from Spanish-speaking patients. We evaluated the educational materials on whether they increased patient knowledge, attitudes, and the likelihood to speak to their doctor, family members, or other MBC patients about biomarker testing. Methods: Patients living with MBC completed an online survey that consisted of answering questions before (baseline survey) and after (endpoint survey) viewing the newly created LBBC educational materials. The surveys and the materials were available in English and Spanish. Survey data was analyzed using descriptive frequencies and mean scores to compare baseline and endpoint results. Results: Twenty-nine participants living with MBC completed the study. Twenty-three participants (79%) completed the study in English while 6 (21%) completed it in Spanish. In total, 60% had been diagnosed with MBC within the past 3 years and 90% were still in treatment. Most (76%) had heard of biomarker testing and 45% had biomarker testing since being diagnosed with MBC. At baseline, 46% of participants strongly agreed that biomarker testing was important, which increased to 61% of participants at endpoint. At baseline, 36% of participants strongly agreed that biomarker testing will improve their cancer journey, which increased to 54% at endpoint. At baseline, 21% of participants strongly agreed that they would talk with their doctor about biomarker testing, compared to 36% at endpoint. Conclusion: The educational materials helped MBC patients learn about biomarker testing, as well as increase positive attitudes towards biomarker testing and the likelihood that patients will speak with their doctor about biomarker testing. Citation Format: T. Petee, A. Dedmon, K. Martin Gonzalez, C. Koffke, A. Leader, J. Sachs. Evaluating the impact of educational materials about biomarker testing for patients with metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-10-02

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-10-02
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS5-10-02: Evaluating the impact of educational materials about biomarker testing for patients with metastatic breast cancer

Amy Leader, J. Sachs, A. Dedmon, T. Petee et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

Abstract PS5-10-02: Evaluating the impact of educational materials about biomarker testing for patients with metastatic breast cancer

Amy Leader, J. Sachs, A. Dedmon, T. Petee, C. Koffke, K. Martin Gonzalez
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: As part of the No One Missed Campaign, Living Beyond Breast Cancer created educational materials about the importance of biomarker testing for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Materials were created in English and culturally adapted to Spanish with input from Spanish-speaking patients. We evaluated the educational materials on whether they increased patient knowledge, attitudes, and the likelihood to speak to their doctor, family members, or other MBC patients about biomarker testing. Methods: Patients living with MBC completed an online survey that consisted of answering questions before (baseline survey) and after (endpoint survey) viewing the newly created LBBC educational materials. The surveys and the materials were available in English and Spanish. Survey data was analyzed using descriptive frequencies and mean scores to compare baseline and endpoint results. Results: Twenty-nine participants living with MBC completed the study. Twenty-three participants (79%) completed the study in English while 6 (21%) completed it in Spanish. In total, 60% had been diagnosed with MBC within the past 3 years and 90% were still in treatment. Most (76%) had heard of biomarker testing and 45% had biomarker testing since being diagnosed with MBC. At baseline, 46% of participants strongly agreed that biomarker testing was important, which increased to 61% of participants at endpoint. At baseline, 36% of participants strongly agreed that biomarker testing will improve their cancer journey, which increased to 54% at endpoint. At baseline, 21% of participants strongly agreed that they would talk with their doctor about biomarker testing, compared to 36% at endpoint. Conclusion: The educational materials helped MBC patients learn about biomarker testing, as well as increase positive attitudes towards biomarker testing and the likelihood that patients will speak with their doctor about biomarker testing. Citation Format: T. Petee, A. Dedmon, K. Martin Gonzalez, C. Koffke, A. Leader, J. Sachs. Evaluating the impact of educational materials about biomarker testing for patients with metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-10-02

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Thomas Jefferson University (US), Living Beyond Breast Cancer (US), Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.