Abstract PS3-04-09: Using a Real-Time Artificial Intelligence Ultrasound System with Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis to Distinguish Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

Abstract Background: Real-time artificial intelligence-based computer-aided detection/diagnosis (AI-CAD) for breast ultrasound enables immediate assessment of suspicious lesions with probability of malignancy (POM) outputs, potentially aiding in the differentiation between ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Identifying ultrasonographic features with significant POM differences between DCIS and IDC may refine clinical triage. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 34 cases (DCIS=12, IDC=22) assessed by a real-time AI solution (CadAI-B for Breast cancer) during breast ultrasound at a tertiary center. POM outputs and BI-RADS categorization were compared across ultrasonographic features including shape, margin, echo pattern, and orientation. Features demonstrating significant POM differences between DCIS and IDC were identified, and comparative analyses were performed to evaluate CadAI-B’s differential diagnostic utility. Results: Overall, IDC demonstrated a higher mean POM (0.365 ± 0.306) compared to DCIS (0.126 ± 0.196, p<0.001). Ultrasonographic features with significant POM differences included irregular shape (IDC: 0.344 vs DCIS: 0.135, p=0.002), indistinct margins (IDC: 0.318 vs DCIS: 0.012, p=0.014), microlobulated margins (IDC: 0.419 vs DCIS: 0.132, p=0.031), hypoechoic pattern (IDC: 0.345 vs DCIS: 0.135, p=0.018), and parallel orientation (IDC: 0.362 vs DCIS: 0.044, p=0.003). These features were associated with larger POM differentials between IDC and DCIS, suggesting enhanced discrimination capacity. Under CadAI-B, IDC cases were more frequently categorized into higher BI-RADS categories, with IDC cases showing a substantial shift towards BI-RADS 4B, 4C, and 5 with high POM outputs. Notably, DCIS cases retained lower POM even when categorized into BI-RADS 4A and 4B. Conclusions: CadAI-B may help distinguish IDC from DCIS during real-time breast ultrasound examinations by reflecting differences in probability of malignancy. This may assist clinical decision-making during scanning by providing consistent, objective data when evaluating suspicious breast lesions. Further studies are needed to confirm its diagnostic value in broader clinical settings. Citation Format: J. Moon, J. Lee, B. Kang, W. Kim, J. Kim, J. Baek, H. Park, H. Kim, G. Baek. Using a Real-Time Artificial Intelligence Ultrasound System with Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis to Distinguish Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-04-09.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-04-09
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS3-04-09: Using a Real-Time Artificial Intelligence Ultrasound System with Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis to Distinguish Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

H. Kim, B. Kang, J. Moon, J. Kim et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
AI in cancer detection
article

Abstract PS3-04-09: Using a Real-Time Artificial Intelligence Ultrasound System with Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis to Distinguish Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

H. Kim, B. Kang, J. Moon, J. Kim, J. Lee, H. Park, J. Baek, W. Kim, G. Baek
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Real-time artificial intelligence-based computer-aided detection/diagnosis (AI-CAD) for breast ultrasound enables immediate assessment of suspicious lesions with probability of malignancy (POM) outputs, potentially aiding in the differentiation between ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Identifying ultrasonographic features with significant POM differences between DCIS and IDC may refine clinical triage. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 34 cases (DCIS=12, IDC=22) assessed by a real-time AI solution (CadAI-B for Breast cancer) during breast ultrasound at a tertiary center. POM outputs and BI-RADS categorization were compared across ultrasonographic features including shape, margin, echo pattern, and orientation. Features demonstrating significant POM differences between DCIS and IDC were identified, and comparative analyses were performed to evaluate CadAI-B’s differential diagnostic utility. Results: Overall, IDC demonstrated a higher mean POM (0.365 ± 0.306) compared to DCIS (0.126 ± 0.196, p<0.001). Ultrasonographic features with significant POM differences included irregular shape (IDC: 0.344 vs DCIS: 0.135, p=0.002), indistinct margins (IDC: 0.318 vs DCIS: 0.012, p=0.014), microlobulated margins (IDC: 0.419 vs DCIS: 0.132, p=0.031), hypoechoic pattern (IDC: 0.345 vs DCIS: 0.135, p=0.018), and parallel orientation (IDC: 0.362 vs DCIS: 0.044, p=0.003). These features were associated with larger POM differentials between IDC and DCIS, suggesting enhanced discrimination capacity. Under CadAI-B, IDC cases were more frequently categorized into higher BI-RADS categories, with IDC cases showing a substantial shift towards BI-RADS 4B, 4C, and 5 with high POM outputs. Notably, DCIS cases retained lower POM even when categorized into BI-RADS 4A and 4B. Conclusions: CadAI-B may help distinguish IDC from DCIS during real-time breast ultrasound examinations by reflecting differences in probability of malignancy. This may assist clinical decision-making during scanning by providing consistent, objective data when evaluating suspicious breast lesions. Further studies are needed to confirm its diagnostic value in broader clinical settings. Citation Format: J. Moon, J. Lee, B. Kang, W. Kim, J. Kim, J. Baek, H. Park, H. Kim, G. Baek. Using a Real-Time Artificial Intelligence Ultrasound System with Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis to Distinguish Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-04-09.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Kyungpook National University Hospital (KR), Kyungpook National University (KR), Skyworks Solutions (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.