Abstract PS3-06-27: Deep Learning to Predict Pathological Complete Response in Patients Receiving NAC using Pre-treatment Clinical and Imaging Features

Abstract Background: Pathological complete response (pCR) after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC) is a strong predictor of survival, making its early prediction clinically valuable. Current research is developing machine learning (ML) models that use pre- and post-treatment MRIs to predict pCR non-invasively. However, there is a critical need for models that rely solely on pre-treatment data to help assess if NAC is appropriate. While some ML models have been developed for this purpose, they have substantially lower accuracy compared to models that add post-treatment data. We address this gap by presenting a novel ML architecture that uses only pre-treatment MRIs while nearing the accuracy of methods that use post-treatment MRIs. Our method uses the pre-treatment MRI to predict radiomic features of the post-treatment MRI, which is then substituted for actual post-treatment imaging. We use the I-SPY2 dataset to train and validate our model. Methods: Our method is 3 steps. Step 1. A Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is trained using both pre- and post-treatment MRIs. This CNN learns the important radiomic features in the MRI to predict pCR.Step 2. A second CNN is trained using the pre-treatment MRI to predict the radiomic features of the post-treatment MRI, essentially predicting the patient’s post-treatment MRI. The CNN predicts the changes in the radiomic features from the pre- to post-treatment MRI, as learned by the first CNN. Step 3. The predicted post-treatment radiomic features from Step 2 are substituted into Step 1, resulting in a model that does not need any post-treatment data. Results: Our method increases accuracy over a CNN that was trained using only pre-treatment MRIs while maintaining 87% of the accuracy obtained by the CNN that uses both treatment time-points. On the ISPY2 dataset, the Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the pre-treatment only CNN is 0.53, the pre- and post-treatment CNN is 0.71, and our proposed method is 0.62. If clinical data (molecular subtype and age) are added as inputs to the model, the AUC for the pre-treatment only CNN is 0.70, the pre- and post-treatment CNN is 0.78, and our proposed method is 0.73, a 3% increase over the model using only pre-treatment MRI. Conclusion: Our study presents a novel deep learning architecture that predicts pCR using only pre-treatment data with an accuracy of 3-9% higher than other pre-treatment methods. This method raises the AUC from 0.53 to 0.62, and up to 0.73 with clinical data, approaching the accuracy of models that use post-treatment data. By eliminating the need for post-treatment scans, our approach could help identify patients who might benefit from alternative or non-operative strategies early in their treatment. Leveraging the robust I-SPY2 dataset, our findings support the potential of radiomics-driven ML models to guide more personalized, less invasive care in breast cancer. Citation Format: R. Gifford, J. Hawley, C. Taylor, B. Griffith, A. Cubbison, S. Beyer, T. Andraos, R. Young, J. Eckstein, S. Jhawar, S. Krening. Deep Learning to Predict Pathological Complete Response in Patients Receiving NAC using Pre-treatment Clinical and Imaging Features [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-06-27.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-06-27
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS3-06-27: Deep Learning to Predict Pathological Complete Response in Patients Receiving NAC using Pre-treatment Clinical and Imaging Features

Clayton R. Taylor, Jeffrey Hawley, Sachin R. Jhawar, Ryan Gifford et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Abstract PS3-06-27: Deep Learning to Predict Pathological Complete Response in Patients Receiving NAC using Pre-treatment Clinical and Imaging Features

Clayton R. Taylor, Jeffrey Hawley, Sachin R. Jhawar, Ryan Gifford, Rena Young, Jacob Eckstein, T.Y. Andraos, Sasha Beyer, Brandy Griffith, Samantha Krening, Alyssa Cubbison
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Pathological complete response (pCR) after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC) is a strong predictor of survival, making its early prediction clinically valuable. Current research is developing machine learning (ML) models that use pre- and post-treatment MRIs to predict pCR non-invasively. However, there is a critical need for models that rely solely on pre-treatment data to help assess if NAC is appropriate. While some ML models have been developed for this purpose, they have substantially lower accuracy compared to models that add post-treatment data. We address this gap by presenting a novel ML architecture that uses only pre-treatment MRIs while nearing the accuracy of methods that use post-treatment MRIs. Our method uses the pre-treatment MRI to predict radiomic features of the post-treatment MRI, which is then substituted for actual post-treatment imaging. We use the I-SPY2 dataset to train and validate our model. Methods: Our method is 3 steps. Step 1. A Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is trained using both pre- and post-treatment MRIs. This CNN learns the important radiomic features in the MRI to predict pCR.Step 2. A second CNN is trained using the pre-treatment MRI to predict the radiomic features of the post-treatment MRI, essentially predicting the patient’s post-treatment MRI. The CNN predicts the changes in the radiomic features from the pre- to post-treatment MRI, as learned by the first CNN. Step 3. The predicted post-treatment radiomic features from Step 2 are substituted into Step 1, resulting in a model that does not need any post-treatment data. Results: Our method increases accuracy over a CNN that was trained using only pre-treatment MRIs while maintaining 87% of the accuracy obtained by the CNN that uses both treatment time-points. On the ISPY2 dataset, the Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the pre-treatment only CNN is 0.53, the pre- and post-treatment CNN is 0.71, and our proposed method is 0.62. If clinical data (molecular subtype and age) are added as inputs to the model, the AUC for the pre-treatment only CNN is 0.70, the pre- and post-treatment CNN is 0.78, and our proposed method is 0.73, a 3% increase over the model using only pre-treatment MRI. Conclusion: Our study presents a novel deep learning architecture that predicts pCR using only pre-treatment data with an accuracy of 3-9% higher than other pre-treatment methods. This method raises the AUC from 0.53 to 0.62, and up to 0.73 with clinical data, approaching the accuracy of models that use post-treatment data. By eliminating the need for post-treatment scans, our approach could help identify patients who might benefit from alternative or non-operative strategies early in their treatment. Leveraging the robust I-SPY2 dataset, our findings support the potential of radiomics-driven ML models to guide more personalized, less invasive care in breast cancer. Citation Format: R. Gifford, J. Hawley, C. Taylor, B. Griffith, A. Cubbison, S. Beyer, T. Andraos, R. Young, J. Eckstein, S. Jhawar, S. Krening. Deep Learning to Predict Pathological Complete Response in Patients Receiving NAC using Pre-treatment Clinical and Imaging Features [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-06-27.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.