Predicting adenine base editing efficiencies in different cellular contexts by deep learning

Background: Adenine base editors (ABEs) enable the conversion of A•T to G•C base pairs. Since the sequence of the target locus influences base editing efficiency, efforts have been made to develop computational models that can predict base editing outcomes based on the targeted sequence. However, these models were trained on base editing datasets generated in cell lines and their predictive power for base editing in primary cells in vivo remains uncertain. Results In this study, we conduct base editing screens using SpRY-ABEmax and SpRY-ABE8e to target 2,195 pathogenic mutations with a total of 12,000 guide RNAs in cell lines and in the murine liver. We observe strong correlations between in vitro datasets generated by ABE-mRNA electroporation into HEK293T cells and in vivo datasets generated by adeno-associated virus (AAV)- or lipid nanoparticle (LNP)-mediated nucleoside-modified mRNA delivery (Spearman R = 0.83–0.92). We subsequently develop BEDICT2.0, a deep learning model that predicts adenine base editing efficiencies with high accuracy in cell lines (R = 0.60–0.94) and in the liver (R = 0.62–0.81). Conclusions In conclusion, our work confirms that adenine base editing holds considerable potential for correcting a large fraction of pathogenic mutations. We also provide BEDICT2.0 – a robust computational model that helps identify sgRNA-ABE combinations capable of achieving high on-target editing with minimal bystander effects in both in vitro and in vivo settings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-292050
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting adenine base editing efficiencies in different cellular contexts by deep learning

Amina Mollaysa, Kim Fabiano Marquart, Paulo J.C. Lin, Nicolas Mathis et al.
Universität Zürich, ZORA
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
article

Predicting adenine base editing efficiencies in different cellular contexts by deep learning

Amina Mollaysa, Kim Fabiano Marquart, Paulo J.C. Lin, Nicolas Mathis, Sharan Janjuha, Yanik Weber, Hiromi Muramatsu, Máté Vadovics, Lucas Kissling, Norbert Pardi, Woohyun J Moon, Gerald Schwank, Ying K Tam, Steven H Y Fan, Michael Krauthammer, Ahmed Allam
article en

Abstract

Background: Adenine base editors (ABEs) enable the conversion of A•T to G•C base pairs. Since the sequence of the target locus influences base editing efficiency, efforts have been made to develop computational models that can predict base editing outcomes based on the targeted sequence. However, these models were trained on base editing datasets generated in cell lines and their predictive power for base editing in primary cells in vivo remains uncertain. Results In this study, we conduct base editing screens using SpRY-ABEmax and SpRY-ABE8e to target 2,195 pathogenic mutations with a total of 12,000 guide RNAs in cell lines and in the murine liver. We observe strong correlations between in vitro datasets generated by ABE-mRNA electroporation into HEK293T cells and in vivo datasets generated by adeno-associated virus (AAV)- or lipid nanoparticle (LNP)-mediated nucleoside-modified mRNA delivery (Spearman R = 0.83–0.92). We subsequently develop BEDICT2.0, a deep learning model that predicts adenine base editing efficiencies with high accuracy in cell lines (R = 0.60–0.94) and in the liver (R = 0.62–0.81). Conclusions In conclusion, our work confirms that adenine base editing holds considerable potential for correcting a large fraction of pathogenic mutations. We also provide BEDICT2.0 – a robust computational model that helps identify sgRNA-ABE combinations capable of achieving high on-target editing with minimal bystander effects in both in vitro and in vivo settings.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.