Open Datasets in Learning Analytics: Trends, Challenges, and Best PRACTICE

Background and context: Open datasets play a crucial role in three prominent research domains that intersect data science and education: learning analytics, educational data mining, and artificial intelligence in education. Researchers in these domains apply computational methods to analyze data from educational contexts, aiming to better understand and improve teaching and learning. Research scope and gap: Providing open datasets alongside research papers supports research reproducibility, fosters collaboration, and increases trust in research findings. It also provides individual benefits for authors, such as greater visibility, credibility, and citation potential. However, despite these advantages, the availability of open datasets and the associated practices within the learning analytics research communities, especially at their flagship conference venues, remain unclear. Goal and method: To address this gap, we conducted a systematic survey of publicly available datasets published alongside research papers in learning analytics domains. We manually examined 1,125 papers from three respected flagship conferences (LAK, EDM, and AIED) over the past five years (2020–2024). We discovered, categorized, and analyzed 172 unique datasets used in 204 publications. Results and contributions: Our study presents the most comprehensive collection and analysis of open educational datasets to date, along with the most detailed categorization. Of the 172 datasets identified, 143 were not captured in any prior survey of open data in learning analytics. We provide insights into the datasets’ context, analytical methods, use, and other properties. Based on this survey, we summarize the current gaps in the field. Furthermore, we list practical recommendations, advice, and 8-item guidelines under the acronym PRACTICE with a checklist to help researchers publish their data. Lastly, we share our original dataset: an annotated inventory detailing the discovered datasets and the corresponding publications. We hope these findings will support further adoption of open data practices in learning analytics communities and beyond.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3798096
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Open Datasets in Learning Analytics: Trends, Challenges, and Best PRACTICE

Erwin Daniel López Zapata, Valdemar Švábenský, Atsushi Shimada, Brendan Flanagan
ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
Online Learning and Analytics
article

Open Datasets in Learning Analytics: Trends, Challenges, and Best PRACTICE

Erwin Daniel López Zapata, Valdemar Švábenský, Atsushi Shimada, Brendan Flanagan
article en

Abstract

Background and context: Open datasets play a crucial role in three prominent research domains that intersect data science and education: learning analytics, educational data mining, and artificial intelligence in education. Researchers in these domains apply computational methods to analyze data from educational contexts, aiming to better understand and improve teaching and learning. Research scope and gap: Providing open datasets alongside research papers supports research reproducibility, fosters collaboration, and increases trust in research findings. It also provides individual benefits for authors, such as greater visibility, credibility, and citation potential. However, despite these advantages, the availability of open datasets and the associated practices within the learning analytics research communities, especially at their flagship conference venues, remain unclear. Goal and method: To address this gap, we conducted a systematic survey of publicly available datasets published alongside research papers in learning analytics domains. We manually examined 1,125 papers from three respected flagship conferences (LAK, EDM, and AIED) over the past five years (2020–2024). We discovered, categorized, and analyzed 172 unique datasets used in 204 publications. Results and contributions: Our study presents the most comprehensive collection and analysis of open educational datasets to date, along with the most detailed categorization. Of the 172 datasets identified, 143 were not captured in any prior survey of open data in learning analytics. We provide insights into the datasets’ context, analytical methods, use, and other properties. Based on this survey, we summarize the current gaps in the field. Furthermore, we list practical recommendations, advice, and 8-item guidelines under the acronym PRACTICE with a checklist to help researchers publish their data. Lastly, we share our original dataset: an annotated inventory detailing the discovered datasets and the corresponding publications. We hope these findings will support further adoption of open data practices in learning analytics communities and beyond.

ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
Kyushu University (JP), Masaryk University (CZ), Kyoto University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.