Births from aneuploid embryos: where is the evidence?

Background Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is used principally to identify embryos with whole chromosome aneuploidy, which are generally considered non-viable. Reports of healthy live births following transfer of embryos classified as fully aneuploid are therefore extraordinary and require rigorous verification. Methods This commentary evaluates how claims of live births from embryos diagnosed as fully aneuploid by PGT-A are generated, interpreted and reported. We examine prevailing evidentiary standards and highlight key sources of potential error, including lack of genetic identity confirmation, natural conception, laboratory or clerical error and misclassification of mosaic or segmental aneuploid embryos. Results To date, no published report has included DNA-based confirmation demonstrating that a healthy child originated from an embryo diagnosed as fully aneuploid. Failure to clearly distinguish whole chromosome aneuploidy from mosaic or segmental aneuploidy, which retain the potential to result in live birth, further complicates interpretation and risks overstating the implications of such reports. Conclusion In the absence of genetic identity confirmation, claims of live births from embryos classified as fully aneuploid cannot be considered evidentiary. As interest in this topic grows, rigorous genetic validation and standardised reporting should be required to ensure scientific credibility, support accurate patient counseling and guide responsible interpretation of these reports.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ connections.
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjccgg-2025-000051
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Births from aneuploid embryos: where is the evidence?

Svetlana Madjunkova, Mitko Madjunkov, Andria G. Besser, Manuel Viotti et al.
BMJ connections.
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Births from aneuploid embryos: where is the evidence?

Svetlana Madjunkova, Mitko Madjunkov, Andria G. Besser, Manuel Viotti, Francesca Spinella, Christo Zouves, Andrea R. Victor, Clifford Librach
article en

Abstract

Background Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is used principally to identify embryos with whole chromosome aneuploidy, which are generally considered non-viable. Reports of healthy live births following transfer of embryos classified as fully aneuploid are therefore extraordinary and require rigorous verification. Methods This commentary evaluates how claims of live births from embryos diagnosed as fully aneuploid by PGT-A are generated, interpreted and reported. We examine prevailing evidentiary standards and highlight key sources of potential error, including lack of genetic identity confirmation, natural conception, laboratory or clerical error and misclassification of mosaic or segmental aneuploid embryos. Results To date, no published report has included DNA-based confirmation demonstrating that a healthy child originated from an embryo diagnosed as fully aneuploid. Failure to clearly distinguish whole chromosome aneuploidy from mosaic or segmental aneuploidy, which retain the potential to result in live birth, further complicates interpretation and risks overstating the implications of such reports. Conclusion In the absence of genetic identity confirmation, claims of live births from embryos classified as fully aneuploid cannot be considered evidentiary. As interest in this topic grows, rigorous genetic validation and standardised reporting should be required to ensure scientific credibility, support accurate patient counseling and guide responsible interpretation of these reports.

BMJ connections.Vol. 3(1)
Long Island University (US), University of Toronto (CA), University of Kindu (CD), New Hope Fertility Center (US), Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences (IT), International Rescue Committee (US), Center for Genomic Science (IT), CReATe Fertility Centre (CA), Foundation for Reproductive Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.