Quantum Model of the Universe (QMU) Volume I: Complete Edition

Preprint.This manuscript is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed.It is currently under consideration for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Quantum Model of the Universe Sources: JWST • HST • Chandra • XMM-Newton • Spitzer • Keck/VLT/ALMA • SDSS • Pan-STARRS • Gaia • Planck/WMAP • Fermi • LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA • NASA • CERN • Academic centers (25 years of research) QUANTUM MODEL OF THE UNIVERSE (QMU)Volume IUniverse Investigation: Complete EditionAuthor: Sergey G. KolesnyakIndependent Researcher in Theoretical Physics and CosmologyORCID: 0009-0008-7506-4013E-mail: [email protected]: January 2026Field: Theoretical Physics / Quantum Cosmology / Information PhysicsThis volume is a continuously updated compilation of the book series “Quantum Model of the Universe”.The present version (v3.0) includes Books 1–5. Subsequent books are added in later versions. AbstractWe address the long-standing problem of constructing a consistent and empirically constrainedframework capable of unifying classical relativistic physics and quantum theory within a singledescription of the Universe. Despite their extraordinary empirical success, general relativity andquantum mechanics remain fundamentally incompatible at the levels of dynamics, interpretation, andfoundational structure, while existing approaches to quantum gravity and cosmological unificationrely on effective prescriptions or phenomenological parametrizations lacking a common basis. Wedevelop an information–geometric framework in which space-time, matter, and quantum statesemerge as interconnected manifestations of an underlying structural organization. Geometry istreated as a dynamical and adaptive entity governed by information-theoretic constraints that admitobservational testing, with classical and quantum regimes arising as effective limits of the sameunderlying description. Motivated by growing tensions between high-precision observations and thestandard cosmological paradigm—including discrepancies revealed by cosmic microwave backgroundmeasurements, large-scale structure surveys, collider constraints, and recent data from the James WebbSpace Telescope—we systematically reassess established models and assumptions in fundamentalphysics and cosmology. The analysis is restricted to scientifically admissible statements, definedas mathematically well-posed and, in principle, observationally testable or refutable. The resultingframework does not propose a speculative alternative to existing theories, but delineates the structuralrequirements and empirical boundaries that any consistent unification of quantum, classical, andcosmological physics must satisfy. Introduction and ScopeThe problem of constructing a consistent description of the Universe has accompanied theoreticalphysics since its inception. From the earliest formulations of classical mechanics to contemporarymodels of quantum fields and cosmology, progress has been driven by the continual refinement ofmathematical structures used to represent physical reality. At each stage, advances were achieved notby the accumulation of isolated facts, but by the introduction of new conceptual frameworks capable ofunifying previously disconnected phenomena.Classical physics, as established in Newtonian mechanics and later refined through analyticalmechanics and classical field theory , provided a coherent and predictive description ofmacroscopic phenomena. Space and time were treated as fixed, absolute backgrounds, while matter andforces evolved within this predefined arena. This paradigm reached a high level of internal consistencyand empirical success, yet it carried implicit assumptions concerning locality, determinism, and theseparability of physical systems.The development of electromagnetism and statistical mechanics already began to strainthese assumptions. Maxwell’s equations introduced field-based descriptions that blurred the distinctionbetween matter and interaction, while Boltzmann’s statistical interpretation of thermodynamics revealedan intrinsic connection between macroscopic laws and microscopic degrees of freedom. These advancesforeshadowed a deeper structural shift in the foundations of physics.The emergence of quantum mechanics in the early twentieth century constituted a decisiverupture with classical intuition. Deterministic trajectories were replaced by probabilistic amplitudes,nonlocal correlations were introduced, and the classical notion of physical reality as a collection ofwell-defined properties was fundamentally challenged. Despite its extraordinary empirical success,quantum mechanics remains conceptually incomplete as a fundamental description of nature. Itsstandard formulations rely on external classical structures, including fixed space-time backgrounds andmeasurement postulates that are not derived from the theory itself.In parallel, general relativity revolutionized the classical understanding of space and time by treatinggeometry as a dynamical entity . Gravitation was no longer a force acting within space-time,but a manifestation of space-time curvature itself. This geometric reinterpretation provided a unifieddescription of inertial motion and gravitation and established the theoretical foundation of moderncosmology. However, general relativity is intrinsically classical and resists straightforwardquantization. Attempts to combine it with quantum theory have revealed deep conceptual andmathematical tensions.Modern cosmology is built upon the synthesis of general relativity, quantum field theory, andastrophysical observations . The standard cosmological model has achieved remarkable success indescribing the large-scale structure of the Universe, the cosmic microwave background, and the expansionhistory inferred from observational data. Nevertheless, this model relies on components whose physicalnature remains poorly understood, including dark matter, dark energy, and vacuum energy. Theseelements enter the theory primarily as effective parameters rather than as consequences of a deeperunderlying structure.Over the past decade, the accumulation of high-precision observational data has revealed a growingnumber of tensions within the standard paradigm. Discrepancies in measurements of the expansion rate,anomalies in early structure formation, and inconsistencies in the interpretation of vacuum energy suggestthat the current framework may be approaching the limits of its applicability.These developments motivate a critical reassessment of the foundational assumptions underlyingcontemporary theoretical physics and cosmology. Rather than introducing additional phenomenologicalparameters or ad hoc modifications, it becomes necessary to examine whether the mathematical andconceptual structures used to describe space, time, matter, and quantum states are themselves emergentrather than fundamental.The present work adopts this perspective by exploring an information–geometric framework in whichphysical structures arise from more primitive informational constraints. Within this approach, geometryis not assumed a priori but emerges as an effective description of relational information. Classicalspace-time, quantum states, and cosmological dynamics are treated as interconnected manifestations ofa single underlying structure, rather than as independent ontological entities.This monograph is not intended as a speculative alternative to established theories, nor as aphilosophical reinterpretation of physical concepts. Its scope is deliberately restricted to scientificallyadmissible statements, defined as those that are mathematically well-posed and, at least in principle,subject to observational constraints or the possibility of refuting the hypothesis by observations. Conceptsthat cannot be framed within this methodological boundary are excluded. We create scientific works that humanity truly needs. Each of our studies is a step forward for mankind, a movement toward knowledge that helps build a better future. Our values are creation, progressive development, and support for all that is most valuable accumulated by humanity: in history, literature, science, culture, and sports. We believe that knowledge is power, and science is the path to a brighter future. You can become a part of this mission. Your support helps us produce discoveries that change people’s lives and advance humanity. Support us via PayPalhttps://www.paypal.com/paypalme/SergeiKolesniak If you have any quations please contact me by email: [email protected]