Under pressure: the politics of clientelism and coercion in Serbia

2. Defining and explaining clientelism 3. Case selection and context: clientelism in Serbia 4. Research strategy 5. Empirical results 6. Concluding discussion Acknowledgements Disclosure statement Additional information Footnotes References Appendixes Full Article Figures & data References Citations Metrics Licensing Reprints & Permissions View PDF(open in a new window)View EPUB(open in a new window) ABSTRACT This article examines the correlates of perceptions of clientelism in Serbia, drawing on original survey data collected in 2024. The analysis explores how employment status, regional differences, and political alignment shape individuals’ perceptions of clientelist exchanges. The findings indicate that regional differences are evident, with respondents from the more developed regions of Belgrade and Vojvodina reporting higher awareness or prevalence of clientelist exchanges than those in Central and Southern Serbia. An analysis of the interaction between voting behaviour and regions indicates a strong partisan effect. Notably, respondents who did not disclose their vote report levels of perceived coercion nearly equivalent to those of opposition voters in the South. These findings align with theoretical expectations that coercive clientelism is not uniform across different contexts but are influenced by local variations in both political and economic competition. This article contributes to broader debates on the persistence of clientelism in post-communist democracies and highlights the diverse forms of clientelism, including its overlap with coercion.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-291753
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Under pressure: the politics of clientelism and coercion in Serbia

Valentina Petrovic
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

Under pressure: the politics of clientelism and coercion in Serbia

Valentina Petrovic
article en

Abstract

2. Defining and explaining clientelism 3. Case selection and context: clientelism in Serbia 4. Research strategy 5. Empirical results 6. Concluding discussion Acknowledgements Disclosure statement Additional information Footnotes References Appendixes Full Article Figures & data References Citations Metrics Licensing Reprints & Permissions View PDF(open in a new window)View EPUB(open in a new window) ABSTRACT This article examines the correlates of perceptions of clientelism in Serbia, drawing on original survey data collected in 2024. The analysis explores how employment status, regional differences, and political alignment shape individuals’ perceptions of clientelist exchanges. The findings indicate that regional differences are evident, with respondents from the more developed regions of Belgrade and Vojvodina reporting higher awareness or prevalence of clientelist exchanges than those in Central and Southern Serbia. An analysis of the interaction between voting behaviour and regions indicates a strong partisan effect. Notably, respondents who did not disclose their vote report levels of perceived coercion nearly equivalent to those of opposition voters in the South. These findings align with theoretical expectations that coercive clientelism is not uniform across different contexts but are influenced by local variations in both political and economic competition. This article contributes to broader debates on the persistence of clientelism in post-communist democracies and highlights the diverse forms of clientelism, including its overlap with coercion.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.