Abstract PS3-01-11: Breast Cancer Risk Prediction for Racially Diverse Women With Benign Breast Disease

Abstract Purpose: Existing breast cancer risk prediction models are ineffective for women with benign breast disease (BBD), especially in racially and ethnically diverse populations. We aimed to identify risk predictors for accurately estimating breast cancer development in a contemporary cohort of women from diverse racial backgrounds diagnosed with BBD. Patients and Methods: We identified 9,202 women diagnosed with histologically-confirmed benign lesions at the Joanne Knight Breast Health Siteman Cancer Center in St. Louis from 2010-2023. Risk modeling was performed with Cox regression using 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) and internally validated through a bootstrap resampling method with 100 replacements (i.e., corrected for overfitting). Discriminatory model performance was estimated by Harrell's C-index. Calibration was assessed by estimating observed and predicted ratio (O/E) at 5-year BC predicted risk. Results: Among the 9,202 women with BBD, 64.3% were White, 32.5% were Black, and 3.2% were Asian women, 3.3% had a subsequent breast cancer at least six months following BBD. The final model predictors included: age at BBD diagnosis, family history of breast cancer, atypical hyperplasia (AH), proliferative disease without atypia (PDWA), breast density, and race. The model discrimination in the original sample had a Harrell's C-index of 0.68 (95%CI 0.65, 0.71) and in the bootstrap sample of 0.67 (95%CI 0.63, 0.70). At the 5-year, the overall model calibration was good (O/E=0.98, 95%CI 0.86, 1.12). The model calibration was satisfactory across most risk-factor-defined subgroups; however, it tended to underestimate risk in the low-risk group and overestimate risk in the high-risk group (as defined by 20% quantiles). Conclusion: The final model outperformed existing breast cancer risk models among BBD women and future research will externally validate the model evaluating the risk among a subset of women with atypia. Citation Format: A. Koric, Y. Park, J. Jiang, F. Boul, G. Colditz. Breast Cancer Risk Prediction for Racially Diverse Women With Benign Breast Disease [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-01-11.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-01-11
Primary Topic
Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS3-01-11: Breast Cancer Risk Prediction for Racially Diverse Women With Benign Breast Disease

Alzina Koric, Y. Park, F. Boul, G. Colditz
Clinical Cancer Research
Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
article

Abstract PS3-01-11: Breast Cancer Risk Prediction for Racially Diverse Women With Benign Breast Disease

Alzina Koric, Y. Park, F. Boul, G. Colditz
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Existing breast cancer risk prediction models are ineffective for women with benign breast disease (BBD), especially in racially and ethnically diverse populations. We aimed to identify risk predictors for accurately estimating breast cancer development in a contemporary cohort of women from diverse racial backgrounds diagnosed with BBD. Patients and Methods: We identified 9,202 women diagnosed with histologically-confirmed benign lesions at the Joanne Knight Breast Health Siteman Cancer Center in St. Louis from 2010-2023. Risk modeling was performed with Cox regression using 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) and internally validated through a bootstrap resampling method with 100 replacements (i.e., corrected for overfitting). Discriminatory model performance was estimated by Harrell's C-index. Calibration was assessed by estimating observed and predicted ratio (O/E) at 5-year BC predicted risk. Results: Among the 9,202 women with BBD, 64.3% were White, 32.5% were Black, and 3.2% were Asian women, 3.3% had a subsequent breast cancer at least six months following BBD. The final model predictors included: age at BBD diagnosis, family history of breast cancer, atypical hyperplasia (AH), proliferative disease without atypia (PDWA), breast density, and race. The model discrimination in the original sample had a Harrell's C-index of 0.68 (95%CI 0.65, 0.71) and in the bootstrap sample of 0.67 (95%CI 0.63, 0.70). At the 5-year, the overall model calibration was good (O/E=0.98, 95%CI 0.86, 1.12). The model calibration was satisfactory across most risk-factor-defined subgroups; however, it tended to underestimate risk in the low-risk group and overestimate risk in the high-risk group (as defined by 20% quantiles). Conclusion: The final model outperformed existing breast cancer risk models among BBD women and future research will externally validate the model evaluating the risk among a subset of women with atypia. Citation Format: A. Koric, Y. Park, J. Jiang, F. Boul, G. Colditz. Breast Cancer Risk Prediction for Racially Diverse Women With Benign Breast Disease [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-01-11.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.