Semiempirical constraints on the HI mass function of star-forming galaxies and Ω $_HI$ at $z$ ∼ 0.37 from interferometric surveys

Context. The H I mass function (HIMF) is a crucial tool for understanding the evolution of the H I content in galaxies over cosmic time and, hence, to constraining both the baryon cycle in galaxy evolution and the reionization history of the Universe. Aims. We aim to derive semiempirical constraints at z ∼ 0.37 by combining literature results on the stellar mass function from optical surveys with recent findings on the M $_{HI}$ − M $_{⋆}$ scaling relation derived via spectral stacking analysis applied to 21 cm line interferometric data from the MIGHTEE and CHILES surveys, conducted with the MeerKAT and VLA radio telescopes, respectively. Methods. We drew synthetic stellar mass samples directly from the publicly available results underlying the analysis of the COSMOS2020 galaxy photometric sample. We then converted M $_{⋆}$ into M $_{HI}$ using analytical fitting functions to the data points from H I stacking. We next fit a Schechter function to the median HIMF from all the samples via Monte Carlo Markov chains. We finally derived the posterior distribution for Ω $_{HI}$ by integrating the models for the HIMF built from the posteriors samples of the Schechter parameters. Results. We find a deviation of the HIMF at z ∼ 0.37 from the results at z ∼ 0 from the ALFALFA survey and at z ∼ 1 from uGMRT data. Our results for Ω $_{HI}$ are in broad agreement with other literature results and follow the overall trend on Ω $_{HI}$ as a function of redshift. The derived value Ω $_{HI}$ = (7.02 $^{+0.59}$ $_{−0.52}$ ) × 10 $^{−4}$ at z ∼ 0.37 from the combined analysis deviates by ∼2.9 σ from the ALFALFA result at z ∼ 0. Conclusions. Our findings regarding the HIMF and Ω $_{HI}$ derived from deep, state-of-the-art interferometric surveys differ from previous literature results at z ∼ 0 and z ∼ 1. We are unable to confirm at this stage whether these differences are due to cosmic evolution consistent with a smooth transition of the H I content of galaxies over the last 8 Gyr or due to selection biases and systematics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-292132
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Semiempirical constraints on the HI mass function of star-forming galaxies and Ω $_HI$ at $z$ ∼ 0.37 from interferometric surveys

F. Sinigaglia, M. Dessauges-Zavadsky, A. Bianchetti, L. Mayer et al.
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
article

Semiempirical constraints on the HI mass function of star-forming galaxies and Ω $_HI$ at $z$ ∼ 0.37 from interferometric surveys

F. Sinigaglia, M. Dessauges-Zavadsky, A. Bianchetti, L. Mayer, M. J. Jarvis, G. Rodighiero, M. Vaccari, E. Elson
article en

Abstract

Context. The H I mass function (HIMF) is a crucial tool for understanding the evolution of the H I content in galaxies over cosmic time and, hence, to constraining both the baryon cycle in galaxy evolution and the reionization history of the Universe. Aims. We aim to derive semiempirical constraints at z ∼ 0.37 by combining literature results on the stellar mass function from optical surveys with recent findings on the M $_{HI}$ − M $_{⋆}$ scaling relation derived via spectral stacking analysis applied to 21 cm line interferometric data from the MIGHTEE and CHILES surveys, conducted with the MeerKAT and VLA radio telescopes, respectively. Methods. We drew synthetic stellar mass samples directly from the publicly available results underlying the analysis of the COSMOS2020 galaxy photometric sample. We then converted M $_{⋆}$ into M $_{HI}$ using analytical fitting functions to the data points from H I stacking. We next fit a Schechter function to the median HIMF from all the samples via Monte Carlo Markov chains. We finally derived the posterior distribution for Ω $_{HI}$ by integrating the models for the HIMF built from the posteriors samples of the Schechter parameters. Results. We find a deviation of the HIMF at z ∼ 0.37 from the results at z ∼ 0 from the ALFALFA survey and at z ∼ 1 from uGMRT data. Our results for Ω $_{HI}$ are in broad agreement with other literature results and follow the overall trend on Ω $_{HI}$ as a function of redshift. The derived value Ω $_{HI}$ = (7.02 $^{+0.59}$ $_{−0.52}$ ) × 10 $^{−4}$ at z ∼ 0.37 from the combined analysis deviates by ∼2.9 σ from the ALFALFA result at z ∼ 0. Conclusions. Our findings regarding the HIMF and Ω $_{HI}$ derived from deep, state-of-the-art interferometric surveys differ from previous literature results at z ∼ 0 and z ∼ 1. We are unable to confirm at this stage whether these differences are due to cosmic evolution consistent with a smooth transition of the H I content of galaxies over the last 8 Gyr or due to selection biases and systematics.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.