Robustness of steroidomics-based machine learning for diagnosis of primary aldosteronism: a laboratory medicine perspective
Objectives: Use of machine learning (ML) in diagnostics offers promise to optimise interpretation of laboratory data and guide clinical decision-making. For this, ML-based outputs should provide robustly reproducible results at least as good as the underlying laboratory data. The objective of this study was to assess robustness of ML-based steroid-probability-scores for diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA). Methods: Reproducibility of ML-based steroid-probability-scores was assessed from coefficients of variation (CVs) for pools of quality control plasma from selected groups of patients with and without PA. Intra-patient measurement variability was assessed from CVs of three consecutive plasma specimens obtained on different days from 77 patients. Inter-laboratory reproducibility was assessed from 47 duplicate plasma specimens analysed in two different laboratories. Conclusions: ML-based steroid-probability-scores for diagnosis of PA display remarkably high robustness according to reproducibility of measurements within and between laboratories as well as within patients.
Authors
- Hanna Remde (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3499-5910)
- Kevin Mantik
- Manuel Schulze (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5819-0835)
- Mirko Peitzsch (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2472-675X)
- Andrea R. Horvath (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7474-3240)
- Carmina Teresa Fuß (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1466-5287)
- Graeme Eisenhofer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8601-9903)
- Georgiana Constantinescu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7304-2557)
- Sven Gruber (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0601-4334)
- Zhong X. Lu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5553-8824)
- Jacques W M Lenders
- Christina Pamporaki
- Tracy Ann Williams
Publication Details
- Journal
- Universität Zürich, ZORA
- Published
- 2025-10-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-292085
- Primary Topic
- Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00