Abstract PS2-08-08: Comparison of anthropometric, systemic and mammary adiposity measures in patients with breast cancer

Abstract Introduction: The obesity-breast cancer (BC) connection is increasingly recognized for its clinical relevance, especially as the proportion of women with BC and overweight/obesity continues to rise. While use of body mass index (BMI) as an adiposity measure is convenient, it is unclear how it relates to other anthropometric, systemic and local adiposity measures as well as with various endocrine, metabolic and inflammatory measures in patients with BC. To explore these complex associations, we launched the prospective FATLAS study (NCT04200768). Methods: FATLAS is a monocentric study set-up at University Hospitals Leuven enrolling cancer treatment naïve patients with BC scheduled for upfront surgery for whom tissue and blood samples are collected. Global adiposity is assessed via body fat percentage, visceral fat (TANITA RD-545), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and BMI. Local adiposity is evaluated by the median size of cancer-associated adipocytes (CAA) and distant mammary adipocytes (DA) in the adjacent normal breast tissue (HALO v3.6.4134). Inflammation markers include global (CRP, β-globulin fraction and WBC, eosinophil and lymphocyte count) and local markers (Crown-like Structures (CLS) density, stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL), IL6, IL18 mRNA expression). Metabolic dysregulation is assessed using global (HbA1c, leptin, HDL, LDL, IGF1 levels, fasting C-peptide and insulin, metabolic syndrome score) and local markers (IGF1, IGF1R and leptin mRNA expression). Correlations were assessed using Spearman coefficients. Results: We included 96 women with ER+/HER2- BC (62% with no special type BC (NST) and 38% with lobular breast cancer (ILC)) of which 41% with normal-weight, 39% with overweight and 20% with obesity. 33% were diagnosed at stage I, 61% at stage II and 5% at stage III. 60% of patients were postmenopausal. Mean age at diagnosis was 57 years. Both body fat percentage and visceral fat showed a strong correlation with BMI (ρ = 0.82, ρ = 0.82), but not with WHR (ρ = 0.32 and ρ = 0.27). Results were consistent across pre/peri- and postmenopausal patients. Adipocyte size increased with BMI in both DA and CAA (ρ = 0.37, ρ = 0.52) with a more pronounced trend in CAA (Kruskal-Wallis 0.001 and p = 0.002 respectively). CAA were consistently smaller than DA across all BMI categories (p<0.05) . The association between adiposity and inflammation was limited when considering all patients, but we did observe significant correlations between global adiposity and CRP (e.g. BMI ρ = 0.53). In pre/perimenopausal patients, global adiposity (BMI) correlated stronger with several systemic (e.g. neutrophil count ρ = 0.56) and local inflammation markers (IL6: ρ = 0.30 and IL18: ρ = 0.40). Regarding local adiposity, DA correlated stronger with several systemic inflammation markers (e.g. CRP ρ = 0.43, CAA ρ = 0.34), while CAA correlated stronger with local inflammation markers (e.g. IL6 CAA: ρ = 0.51; DA: ρ = 0.25). In postmenopausal patients, all global adiposity markers - except WHR - correlated only with CRP (e.g. BMI: ρ = 0.53), while significant correlations were observed between local marker CAA and local inflammation (CLS: ρ = 0.48; sTIL: ρ = -0.30) and systemic CRP (ρ = 0.38). Regarding metabolic dysregulation, BMI correlated with several systemic (e.g. circulating leptin ρ = 0.80) and local markers (e.g. mammary leptin levels ρ = 0.52), with this observation being more pronounced in premenopausal patients (ρ = 0.84 and ρ = 0.69). Conclusion: BMI correlates with body and visceral fat but less with mammary adipocyte size. It remains associated with inflammation and metabolic dysregulation, particularly in pre/perimenopausal patients. Citation Format: J. Van Cauwenberge, I. Bachir, F. Richard, M. Maetens, T. Geukens, K. Van Baelen, M. De Schepper, G. Zels, H. Nguyen, D. Lambrechts, E. Vanderheyden, T. Van Brussel, I. Nevelsteen, A. Smeets, H. Wildiers, P. Neven, G. Floris, C. Desmedt. Comparison of anthropometric, systemic and mammary adiposity measures in patients with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-08-08.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-08-08
Primary Topic
Cancer Risks and Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS2-08-08: Comparison of anthropometric, systemic and mammary adiposity measures in patients with breast cancer

Hans Wildiers, Marion Maetens, Ines Nevelsteen, Imane Bachir et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Risks and Factors
article

Abstract PS2-08-08: Comparison of anthropometric, systemic and mammary adiposity measures in patients with breast cancer

Hans Wildiers, Marion Maetens, Ines Nevelsteen, Imane Bachir, Josephine Van Cauwenberge, Christine Desmedt, Maxim De Schepper, Karen Van Baelen, Gitte Zels, Tatjana Geukens, Thomas Van Brussel, An Smeets, Patrick Neven, F. Richard, E. Vanderheyden, H. Nguyen, D. Lambrechts
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: The obesity-breast cancer (BC) connection is increasingly recognized for its clinical relevance, especially as the proportion of women with BC and overweight/obesity continues to rise. While use of body mass index (BMI) as an adiposity measure is convenient, it is unclear how it relates to other anthropometric, systemic and local adiposity measures as well as with various endocrine, metabolic and inflammatory measures in patients with BC. To explore these complex associations, we launched the prospective FATLAS study (NCT04200768). Methods: FATLAS is a monocentric study set-up at University Hospitals Leuven enrolling cancer treatment naïve patients with BC scheduled for upfront surgery for whom tissue and blood samples are collected. Global adiposity is assessed via body fat percentage, visceral fat (TANITA RD-545), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and BMI. Local adiposity is evaluated by the median size of cancer-associated adipocytes (CAA) and distant mammary adipocytes (DA) in the adjacent normal breast tissue (HALO v3.6.4134). Inflammation markers include global (CRP, β-globulin fraction and WBC, eosinophil and lymphocyte count) and local markers (Crown-like Structures (CLS) density, stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL), IL6, IL18 mRNA expression). Metabolic dysregulation is assessed using global (HbA1c, leptin, HDL, LDL, IGF1 levels, fasting C-peptide and insulin, metabolic syndrome score) and local markers (IGF1, IGF1R and leptin mRNA expression). Correlations were assessed using Spearman coefficients. Results: We included 96 women with ER+/HER2- BC (62% with no special type BC (NST) and 38% with lobular breast cancer (ILC)) of which 41% with normal-weight, 39% with overweight and 20% with obesity. 33% were diagnosed at stage I, 61% at stage II and 5% at stage III. 60% of patients were postmenopausal. Mean age at diagnosis was 57 years. Both body fat percentage and visceral fat showed a strong correlation with BMI (ρ = 0.82, ρ = 0.82), but not with WHR (ρ = 0.32 and ρ = 0.27). Results were consistent across pre/peri- and postmenopausal patients. Adipocyte size increased with BMI in both DA and CAA (ρ = 0.37, ρ = 0.52) with a more pronounced trend in CAA (Kruskal-Wallis 0.001 and p = 0.002 respectively). CAA were consistently smaller than DA across all BMI categories (p<0.05) . The association between adiposity and inflammation was limited when considering all patients, but we did observe significant correlations between global adiposity and CRP (e.g. BMI ρ = 0.53). In pre/perimenopausal patients, global adiposity (BMI) correlated stronger with several systemic (e.g. neutrophil count ρ = 0.56) and local inflammation markers (IL6: ρ = 0.30 and IL18: ρ = 0.40). Regarding local adiposity, DA correlated stronger with several systemic inflammation markers (e.g. CRP ρ = 0.43, CAA ρ = 0.34), while CAA correlated stronger with local inflammation markers (e.g. IL6 CAA: ρ = 0.51; DA: ρ = 0.25). In postmenopausal patients, all global adiposity markers - except WHR - correlated only with CRP (e.g. BMI: ρ = 0.53), while significant correlations were observed between local marker CAA and local inflammation (CLS: ρ = 0.48; sTIL: ρ = -0.30) and systemic CRP (ρ = 0.38). Regarding metabolic dysregulation, BMI correlated with several systemic (e.g. circulating leptin ρ = 0.80) and local markers (e.g. mammary leptin levels ρ = 0.52), with this observation being more pronounced in premenopausal patients (ρ = 0.84 and ρ = 0.69). Conclusion: BMI correlates with body and visceral fat but less with mammary adipocyte size. It remains associated with inflammation and metabolic dysregulation, particularly in pre/perimenopausal patients. Citation Format: J. Van Cauwenberge, I. Bachir, F. Richard, M. Maetens, T. Geukens, K. Van Baelen, M. De Schepper, G. Zels, H. Nguyen, D. Lambrechts, E. Vanderheyden, T. Van Brussel, I. Nevelsteen, A. Smeets, H. Wildiers, P. Neven, G. Floris, C. Desmedt. Comparison of anthropometric, systemic and mammary adiposity measures in patients with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-08-08.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), Breast Cancer Research Foundation (US), VIB-KU Leuven Center for Cancer Biology (BE), Center for Human Genetics (US), Catholic University of America (US), KU Leuven (BE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Cancer Risks and Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.