Best Practice Expert Opinion and Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure Stability in Clinical Trials and Foundational Research After Spinal Cord Injury

Spinal cord injury (SCI) and the associated autonomic dysfunction often lead to unique and severe blood pressure instability, including low resting blood pressure, orthostatic <i>hypo</i>tension, postprandial hypotension, and transient episodic <i>hyper</i>tension. Despite the high prevalence of these complications and the associated negative clinical outcomes, standardized protocols for measuring blood pressure stability in SCI clinical trials and research remain lacking. This guidelines article outlines best practices for measuring blood pressure stability in the SCI population. The guidelines were developed through a comprehensive literature review in combination with expert consensus to describe the techniques and necessary considerations when assessing blood pressure stability in individuals with SCI. We include detailed and rationalized protocols for assessing resting blood pressure, orthostatic hypotension, postprandial hypotension, and autonomic dysreflexia in individuals with SCI. An emphasis is placed on using validated and standardized tools, meticulous preparation, and practical and safe measurement techniques as well as careful consideration and mitigation of the myriad of confounding factors unique to the SCI population. We also advocate for integrating at-home monitoring and mobile health technologies to provide continuous, real-world data on blood pressure stability. Implementing best practice guidelines will enhance the accuracy and reliability of blood pressure assessments in SCI clinical settings and research, thereby facilitating the detection of cardiovascular dysfunction and ultimately improving patient outcomes. This comprehensive framework aims to advance our scientific understanding and clinical management of cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction after SCI, ultimately contributing to better health and quality of life for this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46292/sci25-00021
Primary Topic
Spinal Cord Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Best Practice Expert Opinion and Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure Stability in Clinical Trials and Foundational Research After Spinal Cord Injury

Ellen Merete Hagen, Aaron A. Phillips, Chloe Slocum, Sungchul Huh et al.
Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation
Spinal Cord Injury Research
article

Best Practice Expert Opinion and Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure Stability in Clinical Trials and Foundational Research After Spinal Cord Injury

Ellen Merete Hagen, Aaron A. Phillips, Chloe Slocum, Sungchul Huh, Jill Wecht, Michelle Trbovich, Stephan McKenna
article en

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) and the associated autonomic dysfunction often lead to unique and severe blood pressure instability, including low resting blood pressure, orthostatic <i>hypo</i>tension, postprandial hypotension, and transient episodic <i>hyper</i>tension. Despite the high prevalence of these complications and the associated negative clinical outcomes, standardized protocols for measuring blood pressure stability in SCI clinical trials and research remain lacking. This guidelines article outlines best practices for measuring blood pressure stability in the SCI population. The guidelines were developed through a comprehensive literature review in combination with expert consensus to describe the techniques and necessary considerations when assessing blood pressure stability in individuals with SCI. We include detailed and rationalized protocols for assessing resting blood pressure, orthostatic hypotension, postprandial hypotension, and autonomic dysreflexia in individuals with SCI. An emphasis is placed on using validated and standardized tools, meticulous preparation, and practical and safe measurement techniques as well as careful consideration and mitigation of the myriad of confounding factors unique to the SCI population. We also advocate for integrating at-home monitoring and mobile health technologies to provide continuous, real-world data on blood pressure stability. Implementing best practice guidelines will enhance the accuracy and reliability of blood pressure assessments in SCI clinical settings and research, thereby facilitating the detection of cardiovascular dysfunction and ultimately improving patient outcomes. This comprehensive framework aims to advance our scientific understanding and clinical management of cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction after SCI, ultimately contributing to better health and quality of life for this population.

Topics in Spinal Cord Injury RehabilitationVol. 32(1)
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital (US), Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (US), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), James J. Peters VA Medical Center (US), South Texas Veterans Health Care System (US), Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital (KR), University College London (GB), Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Spinal Cord Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.