QUANTIFYING RISK EXPOSURE IN PEDESTRIAN-VEHICLE SCENARIOS VIA FUZZY TECHNIQUES

Road safety is a major concern that raises significant worries, especially regarding accidents involving pedestrians. Often, the study of interaction between pedestrians and vehicles focuses on various measurable factors such as vehicle speed and pedestrian crossing speed, often overlooking human behaviors that have a significant impact on this interaction. In this regard, studying road risks poses a challenge that requires a systematic approach to successful overcoming. In this article, we compare both fuzzy and intuitionistic approaches to assess pedestrians' exposure to accident risks. These two approaches take uncertainty into account in a more natural way than classical methods based on precise values. Being more adept at handling uncertainty than classical methods, these approaches provide a finer understanding of reality, thus enabling the development of more tailored safety measures to protect pedestrians. Comparative analysis of the results highlights a significant improvement in the accuracy of risk assessments, underscoring the effectiveness of these approaches in the context of road safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18712683
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

QUANTIFYING RISK EXPOSURE IN PEDESTRIAN-VEHICLE SCENARIOS VIA FUZZY TECHNIQUES

Karim El-Mokhtari Benali Youssef
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Traffic and Road Safety
article

QUANTIFYING RISK EXPOSURE IN PEDESTRIAN-VEHICLE SCENARIOS VIA FUZZY TECHNIQUES

Karim El-Mokhtari Benali Youssef
article en

Abstract

Road safety is a major concern that raises significant worries, especially regarding accidents involving pedestrians. Often, the study of interaction between pedestrians and vehicles focuses on various measurable factors such as vehicle speed and pedestrian crossing speed, often overlooking human behaviors that have a significant impact on this interaction. In this regard, studying road risks poses a challenge that requires a systematic approach to successful overcoming. In this article, we compare both fuzzy and intuitionistic approaches to assess pedestrians' exposure to accident risks. These two approaches take uncertainty into account in a more natural way than classical methods based on precise values. Being more adept at handling uncertainty than classical methods, these approaches provide a finer understanding of reality, thus enabling the development of more tailored safety measures to protect pedestrians. Comparative analysis of the results highlights a significant improvement in the accuracy of risk assessments, underscoring the effectiveness of these approaches in the context of road safety.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
École Normale Supérieure Casablanca (MA), University of Hassan II Casablanca (MA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.