Abstract PS1-13-08: Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Artificial Intelligence-derived Mammographic Risk Score in Black and White Women

Abstract Backgrounds Mammographic risk score (MRS), an artificial intelligence (AI)-derived metric from digital mammograms, captures breast tissue characteristics that may reflect cumulative exposures influencing breast cancer development. However, its relationship with well-established risk factors remains unclear. Methods This study included 9,623 cancer-free women from the Joanne Knight Breast Health Cohort who completed a baseline risk questionnaire and had MRS from screening mammograms. From 2008 to 2024, 468 breast cancer were diagnosed. We used linear regression to estimate β coefficients and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations of MRS with lifestyle, reproductive, and previously validated risk factor models. We cross-classified MRS risk quintiles with risk factor models quintiles to compare differences in estimated incidence. Results MRS was positively associated with the Rosner-Colditz (β = 0.199, 95% CI: 0.138 to 0.260) and Tyrer-Cuzick scores (β = 0.072, 95% CI: 0.055 to 0.089). Being postmenopausal before age 50 (β age<50 post-menopause VS age<50 pre-menopause = -0.526, 95% CI: -0.646 to -0.406) were associated with lower MRS, whereas a history of breast biopsy (β yes VS no = 0.373, 95% CI: 0.303 to 0.443), postmenopausal BMI (β = 0.005 per 1kg/m2, 95% CI: 0.002 to 0.009), and breast density (β extremely dense∼55% VS almost all fat∼ 5% =0.374, 95% CI: 0.272 to 0.476) were associated with higher MRS (P <0.001 to 0.022). MRS improved risk factors models: breast cancer incidence increased by 53.2% per quintile of MRS within the Tyrer-Cuzick model and 44.9% within the Rosner-Colditz model (both P < 0.0001). Women reclassified as high risk by MRS were more often younger and Black women. Conclusions MRS captures biologically relevant imaging features shaped by reproductive and metabolic exposures and improves breast cancer risk prediction, particularly for younger and Black women. Incorporating MRS into clinical tools could enable earlier identification of high-risk women, guide risk-reduction strategies, and tailor screening guidelines. Citation Format: T. Lan. Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Artificial Intelligence-derived Mammographic Risk Score in Black and White Women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-13-08.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-13-08
Primary Topic
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS1-13-08: Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Artificial Intelligence-derived Mammographic Risk Score in Black and White Women

Tuo Lan
Clinical Cancer Research
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
article

Abstract PS1-13-08: Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Artificial Intelligence-derived Mammographic Risk Score in Black and White Women

Tuo Lan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Backgrounds Mammographic risk score (MRS), an artificial intelligence (AI)-derived metric from digital mammograms, captures breast tissue characteristics that may reflect cumulative exposures influencing breast cancer development. However, its relationship with well-established risk factors remains unclear. Methods This study included 9,623 cancer-free women from the Joanne Knight Breast Health Cohort who completed a baseline risk questionnaire and had MRS from screening mammograms. From 2008 to 2024, 468 breast cancer were diagnosed. We used linear regression to estimate β coefficients and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations of MRS with lifestyle, reproductive, and previously validated risk factor models. We cross-classified MRS risk quintiles with risk factor models quintiles to compare differences in estimated incidence. Results MRS was positively associated with the Rosner-Colditz (β = 0.199, 95% CI: 0.138 to 0.260) and Tyrer-Cuzick scores (β = 0.072, 95% CI: 0.055 to 0.089). Being postmenopausal before age 50 (β age<50 post-menopause VS age<50 pre-menopause = -0.526, 95% CI: -0.646 to -0.406) were associated with lower MRS, whereas a history of breast biopsy (β yes VS no = 0.373, 95% CI: 0.303 to 0.443), postmenopausal BMI (β = 0.005 per 1kg/m2, 95% CI: 0.002 to 0.009), and breast density (β extremely dense∼55% VS almost all fat∼ 5% =0.374, 95% CI: 0.272 to 0.476) were associated with higher MRS (P <0.001 to 0.022). MRS improved risk factors models: breast cancer incidence increased by 53.2% per quintile of MRS within the Tyrer-Cuzick model and 44.9% within the Rosner-Colditz model (both P < 0.0001). Women reclassified as high risk by MRS were more often younger and Black women. Conclusions MRS captures biologically relevant imaging features shaped by reproductive and metabolic exposures and improves breast cancer risk prediction, particularly for younger and Black women. Incorporating MRS into clinical tools could enable earlier identification of high-risk women, guide risk-reduction strategies, and tailor screening guidelines. Citation Format: T. Lan. Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Artificial Intelligence-derived Mammographic Risk Score in Black and White Women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-13-08.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.