Stress and Deformation Characteristics of the Central‐Southern Tibetan Crust: Insights From Electrical Anisotropy Studies

Abstract Mechanisms governing the stress‐induced surface deformation of the Tibetan Plateau and other continental collision zones remain vigorously debated in the geoscience community. Crustal rheological properties can offer valuable insights into the Earth's deformation patterns. Here, we present an electrical anisotropic study of the crust and upper mantle along a profile in the central‐southern Tibetan Plateau. Our resistivity models unveil a large‐scale conductive layer beneath the study region, with distinct electric anisotropic orientations within the middle and lower crust. The middle crust exhibits nearly north–south (N–S) directed anisotropy features, whereas the lower crust anisotropy axis is east–west (E–W) directed. From the conductivity model, we estimate the melt fraction and viscosity distribution using an experiment‐based empirical formulation. As demonstrated by the petrological experiments, the amphibole‐rich mid‐to‐lower crust could host the aligned fractures/microcracks and melt pockets, possibly facilitating the observed anisotropy. With an anisotropic conduction model, we also show that the distribution characteristics of these cracks and pockets may directly influence the effective conductivity. The two‐layered electrical anisotropy observed likely reflects distinct deformation types and rheological strengths: the N–S electrical anisotropy may originate from fluid‐filled fractures from the brittle deformation in the middle, while the E–W anisotropy may arise from the deformed conductive melt pockets in the ductile lower crust. These findings may provide a novel way to characterize the crustal deformation mechanisms using geo‐electrical anisotropy, in other tectonically active regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jb030594
Primary Topic
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stress and Deformation Characteristics of the Central‐Southern Tibetan Crust: Insights From Electrical Anisotropy Studies

Zhehan Liu, Gaofeng Ye, Wenbo Wei, Letian Zhang et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
article

Stress and Deformation Characteristics of the Central‐Southern Tibetan Crust: Insights From Electrical Anisotropy Studies

Zhehan Liu, Gaofeng Ye, Wenbo Wei, Letian Zhang, Hao Dong, Sheng Jin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Mechanisms governing the stress‐induced surface deformation of the Tibetan Plateau and other continental collision zones remain vigorously debated in the geoscience community. Crustal rheological properties can offer valuable insights into the Earth's deformation patterns. Here, we present an electrical anisotropic study of the crust and upper mantle along a profile in the central‐southern Tibetan Plateau. Our resistivity models unveil a large‐scale conductive layer beneath the study region, with distinct electric anisotropic orientations within the middle and lower crust. The middle crust exhibits nearly north–south (N–S) directed anisotropy features, whereas the lower crust anisotropy axis is east–west (E–W) directed. From the conductivity model, we estimate the melt fraction and viscosity distribution using an experiment‐based empirical formulation. As demonstrated by the petrological experiments, the amphibole‐rich mid‐to‐lower crust could host the aligned fractures/microcracks and melt pockets, possibly facilitating the observed anisotropy. With an anisotropic conduction model, we also show that the distribution characteristics of these cracks and pockets may directly influence the effective conductivity. The two‐layered electrical anisotropy observed likely reflects distinct deformation types and rheological strengths: the N–S electrical anisotropy may originate from fluid‐filled fractures from the brittle deformation in the middle, while the E–W anisotropy may arise from the deformed conductive melt pockets in the ductile lower crust. These findings may provide a novel way to characterize the crustal deformation mechanisms using geo‐electrical anisotropy, in other tectonically active regions.

Journal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthVol. 131(2)
China Geological Survey (CN), Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences (CN), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN), Yiwu Science and Technology Research Institute (CN), Hebei GEO University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.