Barriers and facilitators to integrating mental health and psychosocial support into economic inclusion programming for displaced families in ecuador

Abstract Background Displaced populations have increased rates of mental health problems, which have been shown to have a bidirectional relationship with economic insecurity. Despite growing calls globally to integrate mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) with economic inclusion (EI) programming, few models exist for practical implementation. We co-developed and piloted the Building the Future Toolkit (i.e., the Toolkit), an integrated MHPSS-EI intervention for displaced families in Ecuador, a country that hosts a large number of displaced persons. Here, we present participant and implementer perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to implementation of the Toolkit . Methods Fifty displaced families in Quito participated in a pilot trial of the Toolkit between October 2023 and May 2024. Following completion of the trial, we conducted six focus group discussions (n=31; 22 intervention participants, 9 staff) to explore determinants of implementation outcomes, guided by Proctor’s Implementation Outcomes Framework and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 2.0. Data were analyzed thematically using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach. Results Both intervention participants and staff viewed the Toolkit as highly acceptable, appropriate, feasible, and usable, with strong potential for sustainability. Key facilitators included the holistic integration of mental health and livelihood skills, enhanced social network building among displaced families, the Toolkit’s standardized yet adaptable structure, and alignment with organizational values and existing activities. Barriers included competing economic demands, childcare responsibilities, transportation costs, limited participation of men and youth, and challenges related to donor reporting indicators. Contextual disruptions—such as Ecuador’s 2024 insecurity and energy crisis—posed additional challenges but also demonstrated the Toolkit’s adaptability in unstable environments. Conclusions The Building the Future Toolkit illustrates how integrated MHPSS-EI programming can be designed and implemented in humanitarian contexts through participatory methods. Our findings highlight the multilevel determinants supporting successful implementation and promoting sustainability. Future integrated program efforts should address structural participation barriers, develop strategies to target engagement of men and youth, and work with funding institutions to create indicators that recognize the interdependence of mental health and livelihoods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conflict and Health
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-026-00832-y
Primary Topic
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers and facilitators to integrating mental health and psychosocial support into economic inclusion programming for displaced families in ecuador

Jeremy C. Kane, Daniela Vergara, Arianna Moyano, Sara Vaca et al.
Conflict and Health
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
article

Barriers and facilitators to integrating mental health and psychosocial support into economic inclusion programming for displaced families in ecuador

Jeremy C. Kane, Daniela Vergara, Arianna Moyano, Sara Vaca, Ezra Susser, Kathleen J. Sikkema, Kathryn L. Lovero, Mike Wessels, Matthew Schojan, Andrea Armijos, Annie G. Bonz, M. Claire Greene, Amaleah F. Mirti, Franco Mascayano, Adriana Monar, Efrén Estudillo, Yescárleth Rodríguez
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Displaced populations have increased rates of mental health problems, which have been shown to have a bidirectional relationship with economic insecurity. Despite growing calls globally to integrate mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) with economic inclusion (EI) programming, few models exist for practical implementation. We co-developed and piloted the Building the Future Toolkit (i.e., the Toolkit), an integrated MHPSS-EI intervention for displaced families in Ecuador, a country that hosts a large number of displaced persons. Here, we present participant and implementer perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to implementation of the Toolkit . Methods Fifty displaced families in Quito participated in a pilot trial of the Toolkit between October 2023 and May 2024. Following completion of the trial, we conducted six focus group discussions (n=31; 22 intervention participants, 9 staff) to explore determinants of implementation outcomes, guided by Proctor’s Implementation Outcomes Framework and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 2.0. Data were analyzed thematically using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach. Results Both intervention participants and staff viewed the Toolkit as highly acceptable, appropriate, feasible, and usable, with strong potential for sustainability. Key facilitators included the holistic integration of mental health and livelihood skills, enhanced social network building among displaced families, the Toolkit’s standardized yet adaptable structure, and alignment with organizational values and existing activities. Barriers included competing economic demands, childcare responsibilities, transportation costs, limited participation of men and youth, and challenges related to donor reporting indicators. Contextual disruptions—such as Ecuador’s 2024 insecurity and energy crisis—posed additional challenges but also demonstrated the Toolkit’s adaptability in unstable environments. Conclusions The Building the Future Toolkit illustrates how integrated MHPSS-EI programming can be designed and implemented in humanitarian contexts through participatory methods. Our findings highlight the multilevel determinants supporting successful implementation and promoting sustainability. Future integrated program efforts should address structural participation barriers, develop strategies to target engagement of men and youth, and work with funding institutions to create indicators that recognize the interdependence of mental health and livelihoods.

Conflict and Health
New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University (US)
National Institute of Mental Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.