Symbolic Investiture and Identity-Making in Monastic Accounts of the First Crusade

This article examines the investiture of the crusader cross at the Council of Clermont in 1095. It argues that the presentation of this moment in monastic chronicles of the First Crusade represents a literary policy of social identity-making based upon the monastic experience. Monks were invested at their profession with their habit, which represented both a literal and a metaphorical cross which tied them to their monastic identity. The article goes on to explore the references to military arms in these monastic accounts of the crusader cross, and draws comparisons to contemporary depictions of depositions of arms as a cornerstone of knightly identity. It concludes that the investiture of the cross in 1095 should be considered within broader conversations about early ‘knighting’ practices, and that, despite the monastic influences on their presentation of crusaders, they were depicted deliberately as a distinct social group.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Durham Research Online (Durham University)
Published
2025-02-03
Primary Topic
Medieval History and Crusades
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Symbolic Investiture and Identity-Making in Monastic Accounts of the First Crusade

Alastair R.E. Forbes
Durham Research Online (Durham University)
Medieval History and Crusades
article

Symbolic Investiture and Identity-Making in Monastic Accounts of the First Crusade

Alastair R.E. Forbes
article en

Abstract

This article examines the investiture of the crusader cross at the Council of Clermont in 1095. It argues that the presentation of this moment in monastic chronicles of the First Crusade represents a literary policy of social identity-making based upon the monastic experience. Monks were invested at their profession with their habit, which represented both a literal and a metaphorical cross which tied them to their monastic identity. The article goes on to explore the references to military arms in these monastic accounts of the crusader cross, and draws comparisons to contemporary depictions of depositions of arms as a cornerstone of knightly identity. It concludes that the investiture of the cross in 1095 should be considered within broader conversations about early ‘knighting’ practices, and that, despite the monastic influences on their presentation of crusaders, they were depicted deliberately as a distinct social group.

Durham Research Online (Durham University)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Medieval History and Crusades
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.