Effectiveness and experiences of online mental health peer support for young people: A systematic scoping review

Background: The prevalence of mental health conditions among young people is high and further increasing. Despite this considerable need, barriers remain to accessing and engaging with traditional mental health services. Online mental health peer support is increasingly popular among young people seeking help. However, research examining the effectiveness of online mental health peer support and user-centred experiences remains limited.<br/>Objective: This systematic scoping review aimed to synthesise research evidence on the effectiveness and experiences of online mental health peer support for young people, compare these across different forms, and identify possible applications of online peer support.<br/>Methods: We used five-staged framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley and revised by Levac et al. for this scoping review, and 3 reviewers screened the articles. The IBSS, SSCI, Scopus, PsycINFO, Medline and Social Policy and Practice databases were searched by title and abstract. Retrieved studies (n=8327) were double screened and 38 articles met the criteria to be included in the review. Studies were included if they focused on young people, aged up to and including 25 years; and the intervention was online peer support primarily aimed at supporting mental health.<br/>Results: The number of participants (posts/comments) in each study ranged from 10 to 36,934. 17 included studies reported the effectiveness of online peer support, with 28 studies reported the varying experiences from young users. This review summarised evidence on overall positive clinical outcomes as well as personal recovery outcomes (including improved social connectedness and other personal recovery outcomes), and multidimensional experiences of online mental health peer support (such as fostering resonance or fatigue).<br/>Conclusions: Overall, we found a positive impact of online mental health support on clinical and personal recovery outcomes. However, findings for personal experiences were mixed. Experiences are influenced by safety, anonymity, and the quality of peer interactions. These insights can inform its role alongside traditional services, attractive platform design and safeguarding. Future research should further explore the integration of online peer support, traditional services and various digital platforms to better address young people’s mental health needs and further examine the effectiveness as well as experiences in practice to maximise the peer support benefits and reduce risks.<br/>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Published
2025-12-21
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness and experiences of online mental health peer support for young people: A systematic scoping review

Sebastian Kurten, Gavin; id_orcid 0000-0001-6003-0170 Davidson, Paul; id_orcid 0000-0001-6947-8916 Best, Shuting; id_orcid 0009-0006-4389-6750 Yuan
Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Effectiveness and experiences of online mental health peer support for young people: A systematic scoping review

Sebastian Kurten, Gavin; id_orcid 0000-0001-6003-0170 Davidson, Paul; id_orcid 0000-0001-6947-8916 Best, Shuting; id_orcid 0009-0006-4389-6750 Yuan
article en

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of mental health conditions among young people is high and further increasing. Despite this considerable need, barriers remain to accessing and engaging with traditional mental health services. Online mental health peer support is increasingly popular among young people seeking help. However, research examining the effectiveness of online mental health peer support and user-centred experiences remains limited.<br/>Objective: This systematic scoping review aimed to synthesise research evidence on the effectiveness and experiences of online mental health peer support for young people, compare these across different forms, and identify possible applications of online peer support.<br/>Methods: We used five-staged framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley and revised by Levac et al. for this scoping review, and 3 reviewers screened the articles. The IBSS, SSCI, Scopus, PsycINFO, Medline and Social Policy and Practice databases were searched by title and abstract. Retrieved studies (n=8327) were double screened and 38 articles met the criteria to be included in the review. Studies were included if they focused on young people, aged up to and including 25 years; and the intervention was online peer support primarily aimed at supporting mental health.<br/>Results: The number of participants (posts/comments) in each study ranged from 10 to 36,934. 17 included studies reported the effectiveness of online peer support, with 28 studies reported the varying experiences from young users. This review summarised evidence on overall positive clinical outcomes as well as personal recovery outcomes (including improved social connectedness and other personal recovery outcomes), and multidimensional experiences of online mental health peer support (such as fostering resonance or fatigue).<br/>Conclusions: Overall, we found a positive impact of online mental health support on clinical and personal recovery outcomes. However, findings for personal experiences were mixed. Experiences are influenced by safety, anonymity, and the quality of peer interactions. These insights can inform its role alongside traditional services, attractive platform design and safeguarding. Future research should further explore the integration of online peer support, traditional services and various digital platforms to better address young people’s mental health needs and further examine the effectiveness as well as experiences in practice to maximise the peer support benefits and reduce risks.<br/>

Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.