Methods of Implicit Aspect Detection in Russian Publicistic Texts

This paper compares the performance of various methods of automatic implicit aspect detection in publicistic texts in Russian. The task of implicit aspect detection is an auxiliary task in the aspect-oriented sentiment analysis. The experiments are conducted on a corpus of sentences extracted from political campaign materials. The best results, with the F1-measure reaching 0.84, are obtained using the Navec embeddings and classifiers based on the support vector machine method. Fairly strong results, with the F1-measure reaching 0.77, are obtained using the bag-of-words model and the naive Bayesian classifier. The other methods have a lower performance. It is also found during the experiments that the detection quality can differ significantly between aspects. The detection quality is the highest for the aspects associated with characteristic marker words, for example, healthcare and holding elections. More general aspects, such as quality of governance, are the most difficult to identify.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Automatic Control and Computer Sciences
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3103/s0146411625700300
Primary Topic
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methods of Implicit Aspect Detection in Russian Publicistic Texts

E. M. Kolupaev, I. V. Paramonov, A. Y. Poletaev
Automatic Control and Computer Sciences
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
article

Methods of Implicit Aspect Detection in Russian Publicistic Texts

E. M. Kolupaev, I. V. Paramonov, A. Y. Poletaev
article en

Abstract

This paper compares the performance of various methods of automatic implicit aspect detection in publicistic texts in Russian. The task of implicit aspect detection is an auxiliary task in the aspect-oriented sentiment analysis. The experiments are conducted on a corpus of sentences extracted from political campaign materials. The best results, with the F1-measure reaching 0.84, are obtained using the Navec embeddings and classifiers based on the support vector machine method. Fairly strong results, with the F1-measure reaching 0.77, are obtained using the bag-of-words model and the naive Bayesian classifier. The other methods have a lower performance. It is also found during the experiments that the detection quality can differ significantly between aspects. The detection quality is the highest for the aspects associated with characteristic marker words, for example, healthcare and holding elections. More general aspects, such as quality of governance, are the most difficult to identify.

Automatic Control and Computer SciencesVol. 59(7)
Yaroslavl State University (RU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.