Evaluating the KickAsh!-intervention’s effectiveness in preventing smoking among vulnerable Flemish adolescents: a non-randomized cluster-controlled trial

Adolescents experiencing societal vulnerability are at heightened risk of smoking uptake, exacerbating health disparities. To address this, the KickAsh!-intervention was co-created with adolescents and youth workers in Flanders, Belgium, using the intervention mapping protocol (IMP), aiming to prevent smoking uptake among 10- to 16-year-olds, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds. This study evaluates its effectiveness on adolescents' smoking initiation behaviour and related determinants: smoking intention, attitude, self-efficacy beliefs, coping planning, perceived subjective norms, perceived social pressure, risk perception, and perceived smoking behaviour of peers and youth workers. A non-randomized cluster-controlled trial was conducted across 23 youth social work organizations, with 12 implementing the intervention over four months. Co-creation organizations were pre-assigned to the intervention group. Data were collected via questionnaires at baseline, post-intervention, and seven-month follow-up (total N = 670; mean age = 12.85 years, SD = 2.40; 63.2% boys). Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) in R were used to analyse intervention effects. A significant intervention effect was found for coping planning at post-test (B = 0.57, SE = 0.28, P = .04) and follow-up (B = 1.32, SE = 0.29, P < .001), with intervention participants showing an increase in preparing strategies to resist smoking. No significant effects were observed for smoking initiation behaviour or other determinants. This study found that combining co-creation with the IMP to develop a smoking prevention intervention yielded limited effects. High anti-smoking baseline levels and irregular adolescent attendance may have limited impact, highlighting challenges for implementing and evaluating interventions in youth social work settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Promotion International
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daag022
Primary Topic
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the KickAsh!-intervention’s effectiveness in preventing smoking among vulnerable Flemish adolescents: a non-randomized cluster-controlled trial

Maïté Verloigne, Kenji Leta, Emelien Lauwerier, Veerle Van Oeckel et al.
Health Promotion International
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
article

Evaluating the KickAsh!-intervention’s effectiveness in preventing smoking among vulnerable Flemish adolescents: a non-randomized cluster-controlled trial

Maïté Verloigne, Kenji Leta, Emelien Lauwerier, Veerle Van Oeckel, Babette Demeester, Sara Willems
article en

Abstract

Adolescents experiencing societal vulnerability are at heightened risk of smoking uptake, exacerbating health disparities. To address this, the KickAsh!-intervention was co-created with adolescents and youth workers in Flanders, Belgium, using the intervention mapping protocol (IMP), aiming to prevent smoking uptake among 10- to 16-year-olds, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds. This study evaluates its effectiveness on adolescents' smoking initiation behaviour and related determinants: smoking intention, attitude, self-efficacy beliefs, coping planning, perceived subjective norms, perceived social pressure, risk perception, and perceived smoking behaviour of peers and youth workers. A non-randomized cluster-controlled trial was conducted across 23 youth social work organizations, with 12 implementing the intervention over four months. Co-creation organizations were pre-assigned to the intervention group. Data were collected via questionnaires at baseline, post-intervention, and seven-month follow-up (total N = 670; mean age = 12.85 years, SD = 2.40; 63.2% boys). Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) in R were used to analyse intervention effects. A significant intervention effect was found for coping planning at post-test (B = 0.57, SE = 0.28, P = .04) and follow-up (B = 1.32, SE = 0.29, P < .001), with intervention participants showing an increase in preparing strategies to resist smoking. No significant effects were observed for smoking initiation behaviour or other determinants. This study found that combining co-creation with the IMP to develop a smoking prevention intervention yielded limited effects. High anti-smoking baseline levels and irregular adolescent attendance may have limited impact, highlighting challenges for implementing and evaluating interventions in youth social work settings.

Health Promotion InternationalVol. 41(1)
Ghent University (BE), Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
Universitaire Stichting, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Kom op tegen Kanker
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.