On Style and Mere Stylishness in AI-Generated Art

Abstract This article offers a critical reflection on the problem of pictorial style in artworks made with generative AI, in particular, so-called text-to-image models. As I understand it, there are three factors that complicate the status of style in artworks created by this means. The first problem is taxonomic and stems from a tendency to equate artistic style with an artwork’s signature features. The second problem arises from the difficulty of translating visual qualities into words, or the ekphrastic translation problem; hence, it is one thing to describe in words “what” a picture represents, but it is another thing to describe “how” a picture represents. The third issue is more critical than technical. A picture generated from textual input will be “in a style” and “show a style,” but it will not have a style of its own. Because, I argue, a visual art style cannot be formed from words, a text-generated image will exhibit “mere stylishness,” a combination of manner and signature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jaac/kpaf042
Primary Topic
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Style and Mere Stylishness in AI-Generated Art

Jim Berryman
Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
article

On Style and Mere Stylishness in AI-Generated Art

Jim Berryman
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article offers a critical reflection on the problem of pictorial style in artworks made with generative AI, in particular, so-called text-to-image models. As I understand it, there are three factors that complicate the status of style in artworks created by this means. The first problem is taxonomic and stems from a tendency to equate artistic style with an artwork’s signature features. The second problem arises from the difficulty of translating visual qualities into words, or the ekphrastic translation problem; hence, it is one thing to describe in words “what” a picture represents, but it is another thing to describe “how” a picture represents. The third issue is more critical than technical. A picture generated from textual input will be “in a style” and “show a style,” but it will not have a style of its own. Because, I argue, a visual art style cannot be formed from words, a text-generated image will exhibit “mere stylishness,” a combination of manner and signature.

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism
University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.