The unheard ‘scandal’: Covid‐19 vaccine‐injured people's perceptions of the national redress scheme and trust in the government in the United Kingdom

Abstract This article examines 218 Covid‐19 vaccine‐injured people's experiences of the process of seeking redress from the UK Government's Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS). Moreover, it engages with the wider topic of how we can understand the government(s)’ role in dealing with an ‘emergency’ (the Covid‐19 pandemic) and the consequent (global) health crisis. Vaccine‐injured individuals and communities perceive suffering health problems after Covid‐19 vaccination as a ‘tragedy’, which requires an adequate response. However, the VDPS often does not meet their expectations, which fuels the vaccine‐injured community's narratives around an emerging ‘scandal’ over inadequate redress provision for those who suffered adverse effects following Covid‐19 vaccines. These perceptions and meaning‐making are in stark contrast to the fact that the wider population is unaffected by these issues and are generally not aware of the harms suffered or of the VDPS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Law and Society
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.70047
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The unheard ‘scandal’: Covid‐19 vaccine‐injured people's perceptions of the national redress scheme and trust in the government in the United Kingdom

Fanni Gyurko, SONIA MACLEOD
Journal of Law and Society
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

The unheard ‘scandal’: Covid‐19 vaccine‐injured people's perceptions of the national redress scheme and trust in the government in the United Kingdom

Fanni Gyurko, SONIA MACLEOD
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines 218 Covid‐19 vaccine‐injured people's experiences of the process of seeking redress from the UK Government's Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS). Moreover, it engages with the wider topic of how we can understand the government(s)’ role in dealing with an ‘emergency’ (the Covid‐19 pandemic) and the consequent (global) health crisis. Vaccine‐injured individuals and communities perceive suffering health problems after Covid‐19 vaccination as a ‘tragedy’, which requires an adequate response. However, the VDPS often does not meet their expectations, which fuels the vaccine‐injured community's narratives around an emerging ‘scandal’ over inadequate redress provision for those who suffered adverse effects following Covid‐19 vaccines. These perceptions and meaning‐making are in stark contrast to the fact that the wider population is unaffected by these issues and are generally not aware of the harms suffered or of the VDPS.

Journal of Law and Society
University of Oxford (GB), Science Oxford (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.