Global vs. standalone forecasting for load-level prediction in distribution service areas

Load-level prediction in distribution areas is vital for ensuring grid reliability and resource optimization. This paper compares two modeling strategies — global and standalone — for this task. In the global approach, a shared model is trained using historical data from multiple areas, while the standalone method builds a separate model for each area. Two architectures, CNN and DLinear, are adopted. Load levels are derived from predicted load ratios and classified into three categories: light, normal, and high. Results show that global modeling consistently outperforms standalone modeling in classification accuracy under the same architecture, especially for DLinear. This study offers practical insights into collaborative forecasting across service areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IET conference proceedings.
Published
2026-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2025.3938
Primary Topic
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global vs. standalone forecasting for load-level prediction in distribution service areas

C. Lu, Xuemei He, Jiejie Dai, Junyi Tao et al.
IET conference proceedings.
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
article

Global vs. standalone forecasting for load-level prediction in distribution service areas

C. Lu, Xuemei He, Jiejie Dai, Junyi Tao, Zehui Shi, Yuan Ma, Zeshuang Li, Zhuang Chen, Yu Yi
article en

Abstract

Load-level prediction in distribution areas is vital for ensuring grid reliability and resource optimization. This paper compares two modeling strategies — global and standalone — for this task. In the global approach, a shared model is trained using historical data from multiple areas, while the standalone method builds a separate model for each area. Two architectures, CNN and DLinear, are adopted. Load levels are derived from predicted load ratios and classified into three categories: light, normal, and high. Results show that global modeling consistently outperforms standalone modeling in classification accuracy under the same architecture, especially for DLinear. This study offers practical insights into collaborative forecasting across service areas.

IET conference proceedings.Vol. 2025(38)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Shanghai Advanced Research Institute (CN), Shanghai Electric (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Global vs. standalone forecasting for load-level prediction in distribution service areas — C. Lu, Xuemei He, et al. · IET conference proceedings. (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS