When to Mix It Up? Sorting, Inequality, and Re-distributive Taxation

Abstract This paper examines optimal taxation in a labour market with assortative matching and two-sided heterogeneity. Positive assortative matching, where high-type workers pair with similar types, enhances production efficiency but increases income inequality. Using a matching model with transferable utility, we analyse optimal redistributive tax schedules under various market equilibria. Our findings show that supermodularity in production does not guarantee positive matching as optimal, and increasing mixed-skill matching reduces inequality. In mixed matching equilibria, the optimal tax is regressive at higher incomes but progressive at lower incomes. Tax progressivity decreases with higher productivity of mixed-matching pairs and a greater proportion of skilled workers. Government policy aims to reduce inequality through direct transfers and influencing worker sorting, with significant implications for tax policy design amidst technological changes and evolving skill distributions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics
Published
2026-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2025-0071
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When to Mix It Up? Sorting, Inequality, and Re-distributive Taxation

Teng Ge, Ali Moghaddasi Kelishomi
The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
article

When to Mix It Up? Sorting, Inequality, and Re-distributive Taxation

Teng Ge, Ali Moghaddasi Kelishomi
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines optimal taxation in a labour market with assortative matching and two-sided heterogeneity. Positive assortative matching, where high-type workers pair with similar types, enhances production efficiency but increases income inequality. Using a matching model with transferable utility, we analyse optimal redistributive tax schedules under various market equilibria. Our findings show that supermodularity in production does not guarantee positive matching as optimal, and increasing mixed-skill matching reduces inequality. In mixed matching equilibria, the optimal tax is regressive at higher incomes but progressive at lower incomes. Tax progressivity decreases with higher productivity of mixed-matching pairs and a greater proportion of skilled workers. Government policy aims to reduce inequality through direct transfers and influencing worker sorting, with significant implications for tax policy design amidst technological changes and evolving skill distributions.

The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics
Oxford Brookes University (GB), Loughborough University (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.