Watch-and-Wait strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a comprehensive review

The conventional treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) primarily involves neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) combined with total mesorectal excision (TME). However, surgery-related complications and long-term functional impairments can significantly compromise patients' quality of life. The watch-and-wait (W&W) strategy has emerged as a non-surgical alternative for patients achieving a clinical complete response (cCR), with advantages in organ preservation. Its safety and efficacy have been validated by multiple clinical studies. Literature retrieval was performed in PubMed (2020-2025), including reviews, RCTs/cohort studies on LARC W&W and cCR/pCR. This comprehensive review summarizes the clinical evidence, patient selection criteria, efficacy assessment methods, challenges, and future directions of the W&W strategy. Based on the latest research, when strictly selecting cCR patients (especially those with sustained cCR after neoadjuvant therapy), the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate of the W&W strategy is comparable to that of the surgical group (70%-85%), with a local regrowth rate of approximately 20%-30%, which can mostly be controlled by salvage surgery. The combination of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis significantly improves the accuracy of cCR assessment. Furthermore, integrating immunotherapy with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has expanded the eligible population for the W&W strategy. This review also highlights current limitations of the W&W strategy, such as the lack of standardized assessment procedures, validated biomarkers, and long-term follow-up data. It proposes that future efforts should focus on multi-center randomized controlled trials and artificial intelligence-assisted assessment models to promote the advancement of the W&W strategy toward precision and standardization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2026-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1760042
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Watch-and-Wait strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a comprehensive review

Xiaoyue Zhao, Peng Huang, Xi Liu, Fei Fei et al.
Frontiers in Oncology
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Watch-and-Wait strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a comprehensive review

Xiaoyue Zhao, Peng Huang, Xi Liu, Fei Fei, Huanhuan Fei, Yongjun Yu, Linzhu Zhang, Rong Wu
article en

Abstract

The conventional treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) primarily involves neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) combined with total mesorectal excision (TME). However, surgery-related complications and long-term functional impairments can significantly compromise patients' quality of life. The watch-and-wait (W&W) strategy has emerged as a non-surgical alternative for patients achieving a clinical complete response (cCR), with advantages in organ preservation. Its safety and efficacy have been validated by multiple clinical studies. Literature retrieval was performed in PubMed (2020-2025), including reviews, RCTs/cohort studies on LARC W&W and cCR/pCR. This comprehensive review summarizes the clinical evidence, patient selection criteria, efficacy assessment methods, challenges, and future directions of the W&W strategy. Based on the latest research, when strictly selecting cCR patients (especially those with sustained cCR after neoadjuvant therapy), the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate of the W&W strategy is comparable to that of the surgical group (70%-85%), with a local regrowth rate of approximately 20%-30%, which can mostly be controlled by salvage surgery. The combination of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis significantly improves the accuracy of cCR assessment. Furthermore, integrating immunotherapy with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has expanded the eligible population for the W&W strategy. This review also highlights current limitations of the W&W strategy, such as the lack of standardized assessment procedures, validated biomarkers, and long-term follow-up data. It proposes that future efforts should focus on multi-center randomized controlled trials and artificial intelligence-assisted assessment models to promote the advancement of the W&W strategy toward precision and standardization.

Frontiers in OncologyVol. 16
Nankai University (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (CN), Jiangsu Province Hospital (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University (CN), Nanjing Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.