Implementation Strategies and Outcomes of Physical Activity and Nutrition: Baseline Values of Missouri SPAN, HOP, and REACH Programs

Missourians are not meeting recommendations for physical activity or nutrition. To address this challenge, the CDC has provided Missouri with state (SPAN), regional (HOP), and community-level (REACH) funding to implement large-scale programs. This study describes the implementation strategies and outcomes of SPAN, HOP, and REACH programs in Missouri. A cross-sectional, online survey was conducted in 2024 of practitioners from SPAN, HOP, and REACH program collaborating organizations, who implemented policy, systems, and environmental change to improve physical activity and nutrition. Implementation strategies were assessed using a comprehensive list of 73 implementation strategies. Implementation, service, and client outcomes were assessed using an 11-item questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all study variables. Across programs, most practitioners (n = 44) were female (50.0%-61.5%), White (61.5%-92.3%), and had graduate degrees (62.5%-100%). Overall, the most common strategies used were providing interactive assistance (89.5%-81.0%), adapting and tailoring to context (89.5%-81.0%), and developing stakeholder interrelationships (84.2%-81.0%). Programs were reported to be safe (M = 4.80-4.69), effective (M = 4.47-4.18), timely (M = 4.60-4.35), and likely to improve physical activity and nutrition (M = 4.33-4.06). Missouri's programs employ strategies that reportedly reached priority populations. These programs seem to work upstream of policy, systems, and environment on capacity building. Future longitudinal studies should examine the impact of implementation strategies on built environment changes to ensure lasting health improvements for Missourians.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Promotion Practice
Published
2026-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399261419073
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation Strategies and Outcomes of Physical Activity and Nutrition: Baseline Values of Missouri SPAN, HOP, and REACH Programs

Kelsey Gardiner, Joseph S. Lightner, Alisea Brooks, Kimberly Keller et al.
Health Promotion Practice
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

Implementation Strategies and Outcomes of Physical Activity and Nutrition: Baseline Values of Missouri SPAN, HOP, and REACH Programs

Kelsey Gardiner, Joseph S. Lightner, Alisea Brooks, Kimberly Keller, Jessica L Price, Mansoo Yu, Erich Hellmer
article en

Abstract

Missourians are not meeting recommendations for physical activity or nutrition. To address this challenge, the CDC has provided Missouri with state (SPAN), regional (HOP), and community-level (REACH) funding to implement large-scale programs. This study describes the implementation strategies and outcomes of SPAN, HOP, and REACH programs in Missouri. A cross-sectional, online survey was conducted in 2024 of practitioners from SPAN, HOP, and REACH program collaborating organizations, who implemented policy, systems, and environmental change to improve physical activity and nutrition. Implementation strategies were assessed using a comprehensive list of 73 implementation strategies. Implementation, service, and client outcomes were assessed using an 11-item questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all study variables. Across programs, most practitioners (n = 44) were female (50.0%-61.5%), White (61.5%-92.3%), and had graduate degrees (62.5%-100%). Overall, the most common strategies used were providing interactive assistance (89.5%-81.0%), adapting and tailoring to context (89.5%-81.0%), and developing stakeholder interrelationships (84.2%-81.0%). Programs were reported to be safe (M = 4.80-4.69), effective (M = 4.47-4.18), timely (M = 4.60-4.35), and likely to improve physical activity and nutrition (M = 4.33-4.06). Missouri's programs employ strategies that reportedly reached priority populations. These programs seem to work upstream of policy, systems, and environment on capacity building. Future longitudinal studies should examine the impact of implementation strategies on built environment changes to ensure lasting health improvements for Missourians.

Health Promotion Practice
Washington University in St. Louis (US), Missouri Department of Agriculture (US), RNET Technologies (United States) (US), University of Missouri–Kansas City (US), University of Missouri (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.