Effects of conservative interventions on plantar pressure in individuals with flat foot: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pes planus involves the collapse of the medial longitudinal arch, altering gait and plantar pressure and leading to pain and injury. This review aimed to evaluate the effects of conservative interventions on plantar pressure in flatfoot patients. Four databases were searched from inception to 20 February 2025. Two reviewers screened studies using predefined criteria and the Downs and Black scale. Eligible designs included randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental, and observational studies. Mean differences with 95% CIs were synthesized using a random-effects model, and evidence strength was graded using modified van Tulder criteria. Twenty-eight studies (5–80 participants; total n = 815) involving young to middle-aged adults with flexible flatfoot were included, and most showed moderate methodological quality. Exercise significantly reduced medial-heel pressure (MD − 12.61; 95% CI − 21.23 to − 3.98; strong evidence; 2 RCTs) but showed no significant change in midfoot pressure (MD 0.62; 95% CI − 4.41 to 5.65; 2 RCTs). Taping reduced medial-forefoot peak pressure (MD − 3.40; 95% CI − 5.78 to − 1.03; strong evidence; 5 studies) and did not change lateral-heel pressure (MD -1.26 ; 95% CI -5.11 to 2.58; strong evidence; 5 studies). Taping increased second-toe pressure by 28.2% (MD 3.69; 95% CI 1.64 to 5.75; 2 studies) and third-to-fifth-toe pressure by 34.7% (MD 3.21; 95% CI 1.85 to 4.56; 2 studies), while reducing middle forefoot by 18.2% (MD − 6.33; 95% CI − 8.95 to − 3.71; moderate evidence; 2 studies) and lateral forefoot by 12.4% (MD − 1.24; 95% CI − 2.14 to − 0.34; moderate evidence; 3 studies). Insoles increased medial-midfoot pressure by 61% (MD 29.15; 95% CI 17.23 to 41.06; 2 studies) but did not significantly change first-metatarsal (MD 8.79; 95% CI − 11.75 to 29.33; 2 studies) and lateral-midfoot pressures (MD 5.93; 95% CI − 26.31 to 38.16; 2 studies). Overall, conservative interventions may modify plantar-pressure distribution and provide short-term relief (primarily from acute/single-session taping and insole studies, with exercise effects observed over periods up to 8 weeks), but long-term efficacy remains unclear. Protocol registration: CRD42024621107.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40771-5
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of conservative interventions on plantar pressure in individuals with flat foot: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Fateme Khorramroo, Verisheh Mahmoudiyan, Hooman Minoonejad
Scientific Reports
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

Effects of conservative interventions on plantar pressure in individuals with flat foot: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Fateme Khorramroo, Verisheh Mahmoudiyan, Hooman Minoonejad
article en

Abstract

Pes planus involves the collapse of the medial longitudinal arch, altering gait and plantar pressure and leading to pain and injury. This review aimed to evaluate the effects of conservative interventions on plantar pressure in flatfoot patients. Four databases were searched from inception to 20 February 2025. Two reviewers screened studies using predefined criteria and the Downs and Black scale. Eligible designs included randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental, and observational studies. Mean differences with 95% CIs were synthesized using a random-effects model, and evidence strength was graded using modified van Tulder criteria. Twenty-eight studies (5–80 participants; total n = 815) involving young to middle-aged adults with flexible flatfoot were included, and most showed moderate methodological quality. Exercise significantly reduced medial-heel pressure (MD − 12.61; 95% CI − 21.23 to − 3.98; strong evidence; 2 RCTs) but showed no significant change in midfoot pressure (MD 0.62; 95% CI − 4.41 to 5.65; 2 RCTs). Taping reduced medial-forefoot peak pressure (MD − 3.40; 95% CI − 5.78 to − 1.03; strong evidence; 5 studies) and did not change lateral-heel pressure (MD -1.26 ; 95% CI -5.11 to 2.58; strong evidence; 5 studies). Taping increased second-toe pressure by 28.2% (MD 3.69; 95% CI 1.64 to 5.75; 2 studies) and third-to-fifth-toe pressure by 34.7% (MD 3.21; 95% CI 1.85 to 4.56; 2 studies), while reducing middle forefoot by 18.2% (MD − 6.33; 95% CI − 8.95 to − 3.71; moderate evidence; 2 studies) and lateral forefoot by 12.4% (MD − 1.24; 95% CI − 2.14 to − 0.34; moderate evidence; 3 studies). Insoles increased medial-midfoot pressure by 61% (MD 29.15; 95% CI 17.23 to 41.06; 2 studies) but did not significantly change first-metatarsal (MD 8.79; 95% CI − 11.75 to 29.33; 2 studies) and lateral-midfoot pressures (MD 5.93; 95% CI − 26.31 to 38.16; 2 studies). Overall, conservative interventions may modify plantar-pressure distribution and provide short-term relief (primarily from acute/single-session taping and insole studies, with exercise effects observed over periods up to 8 weeks), but long-term efficacy remains unclear. Protocol registration: CRD42024621107.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
University of Tehran (IR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.