Antibiotics Use Patterns in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review Analysis

Antibiotics are vital for treating infections, but their inappropriate use has driven widespread resistance, now a major global health threat. This systematic review examines antibiotic use patterns in low- and middle-income countries using WHO's prescribing indicator, aiming to guide interventions that promote rational antibiotic use, reduce resistance, and improve public health outcomes. The review followed PRISMA guidelines, searching databases such as Scopus, Embase (Ovid), and Medline (Ovid) for publications from January 2010 to November 2025. Titles and abstracts were initially screened by the first reviewer and discussed with a second reviewer to assess eligibility. Full texts of eligible articles were then independently reviewed by the reviewers, with final inclusion determined through consensus. The methodological quality of selected studies was evaluated using the Kmet Critical Appraisal Checklist. Studies were categorized into 3 groups-public and private sector, public sector only, and private sector only-to examine antibiotic use patterns relative to WHO standards, alongside demographic and institutional data. Electronic searches identified 2912 studies, of which 20 cross-sectional studies were from 11 countries considered eligible for inclusion. Their methodological quality scores ranged from 0.50 to 0.78. Across all studies, the average "<i>percentage of prescriptions with antibiotics</i>" was 51.4%, with 52.7% in the private sector, 49.3% in the public sector, and 61.8% in studies covering both sectors. Amoxicillin, an "Access" antibiotic under the WHO AWaRe framework, was most frequently prescribed, while "Watch" antibiotics such as ceftriaxone and cefixime were also widely used. Some studies reported high Watch antibiotic use (47.4%-74.0%), exceeding WHO recommendation and raising significant concern. The types of antibiotics prescribed also varied across age groups. The percentage of prescriptions with antibiotics and prescribing Watch group antibiotics was found to be higher than the WHO recommendation across studies. Implementing effective antibiotic stewardship programs is recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
INQUIRY The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580261420724
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Antibiotics Use Patterns in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review Analysis

Ranjeeta Subedi, Anant Nepal, Nilam Bhandari, Delia Hendrie
INQUIRY The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

Antibiotics Use Patterns in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review Analysis

Ranjeeta Subedi, Anant Nepal, Nilam Bhandari, Delia Hendrie
article en

Abstract

Antibiotics are vital for treating infections, but their inappropriate use has driven widespread resistance, now a major global health threat. This systematic review examines antibiotic use patterns in low- and middle-income countries using WHO's prescribing indicator, aiming to guide interventions that promote rational antibiotic use, reduce resistance, and improve public health outcomes. The review followed PRISMA guidelines, searching databases such as Scopus, Embase (Ovid), and Medline (Ovid) for publications from January 2010 to November 2025. Titles and abstracts were initially screened by the first reviewer and discussed with a second reviewer to assess eligibility. Full texts of eligible articles were then independently reviewed by the reviewers, with final inclusion determined through consensus. The methodological quality of selected studies was evaluated using the Kmet Critical Appraisal Checklist. Studies were categorized into 3 groups-public and private sector, public sector only, and private sector only-to examine antibiotic use patterns relative to WHO standards, alongside demographic and institutional data. Electronic searches identified 2912 studies, of which 20 cross-sectional studies were from 11 countries considered eligible for inclusion. Their methodological quality scores ranged from 0.50 to 0.78. Across all studies, the average "<i>percentage of prescriptions with antibiotics</i>" was 51.4%, with 52.7% in the private sector, 49.3% in the public sector, and 61.8% in studies covering both sectors. Amoxicillin, an "Access" antibiotic under the WHO AWaRe framework, was most frequently prescribed, while "Watch" antibiotics such as ceftriaxone and cefixime were also widely used. Some studies reported high Watch antibiotic use (47.4%-74.0%), exceeding WHO recommendation and raising significant concern. The types of antibiotics prescribed also varied across age groups. The percentage of prescriptions with antibiotics and prescribing Watch group antibiotics was found to be higher than the WHO recommendation across studies. Implementing effective antibiotic stewardship programs is recommended.

INQUIRY The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and FinancingVol. 63
Curtin University (AU), Grande International Hospital (NP), Kathmandu University (NP)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.