Using oral exams in physics and astronomy courses

Historically, oral exams were common across academia, though their popularity has recently declined. Because they are vulnerable to bias and subjectivity, difficult to administer, and impractical in large college classes, many advocate against their use in assessment. I present a method for administering oral examinations in upper-level undergraduate courses that mitigates some of the disadvantages. This method creates a rigid question structure that assesses student mastery of material, has a well-defined grading structure to standardize evaluation, and can be administered under time constraints to reduce workload. I emphasize holistic verbal communication and evaluation that mirrors the talks and interviews that are common throughout a scientist's career.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Physics
Published
2026-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0276805
Primary Topic
Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using oral exams in physics and astronomy courses

Brian DiGiorgio Zanger
American Journal of Physics
Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
article

Using oral exams in physics and astronomy courses

Brian DiGiorgio Zanger
article en

Abstract

Historically, oral exams were common across academia, though their popularity has recently declined. Because they are vulnerable to bias and subjectivity, difficult to administer, and impractical in large college classes, many advocate against their use in assessment. I present a method for administering oral examinations in upper-level undergraduate courses that mitigates some of the disadvantages. This method creates a rigid question structure that assesses student mastery of material, has a well-defined grading structure to standardize evaluation, and can be administered under time constraints to reduce workload. I emphasize holistic verbal communication and evaluation that mirrors the talks and interviews that are common throughout a scientist's career.

American Journal of PhysicsVol. 94(3)
Swarthmore College (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.