Evaluation of a Subsampling Protocol for RapidHITTM ID V2 Analysis

Background/Objectives: Rapid DNA systems accelerate STR profiling but often require the consumption of the entire swab, limiting confirmation testing or downstream analyses. We previously validated a simple subsampling protocol for blood swabs on the RapidHITTM ID, using a rigid subungual mini-swab (Copan Italia S.p.A). A new version of this instrument has recently been released, featuring redesigned software and consumables. The RapidINTELTM Plus sample cartridge now enables two distinct lysis/extraction protocols, expanding analytical possibilities for rich biological traces. We evaluated subsampling performance using the subungual mini-swab and microFLOQ® swabs (Copan Italia S.p.A), and assessed feasibility for both blood and buccal reference swabs. Methods: Whole blood from four donors was deposited onto regular Copan swabs (10 µL) or microFLOQ® swabs (1 µL). A comparison was performed between the direct analysis of blood swabs using a RapidHITTM ID V1 (RapidINTELTM cartridge) and a RapidHITTM ID V2 (RapidINTELTM Plus cartridge, GENERAL protocol). Subsequently, both the GENERAL and SPECIALIZED protocols were tested after subsampling from primary blood or buccal swabs dried for 24 h using either a subungual mini-swab or a microFLOQ®. Results: Blood-swab subsampling on the V2 produced usable STR profiles with both the subungual mini-swab and the microFLOQ®. The subungual mini-swab was compatible with both the GENERAL and SPECIALIZED protocols. For blood applications, microFLOQ® fiber treatment showed no inhibitory effects. Reference buccal swabs were successfully analyzed with the RapidINTELTM Plus cartridge, either directly (regular swab) or via subungual subsampling under both protocols. In contrast, in this feasibility dataset (single analysis per donor per condition), subsampling a reference swab with microFLOQ® did not yield suitable profiles for RapidINTELTM Plus analysis under the tested conditions. Conclusions: This feasibility study indicates that the subsampling strategy can be applied on the RapidHITTM ID V2, particularly using subungual mini-swabs, to retain the primary swab for potential downstream testing while maintaining usable STR profile quality for blood and buccal reference workflows under the tested conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forensic Sciences
Published
2026-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/forensicsci6010019
Primary Topic
Forensic and Genetic Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of a Subsampling Protocol for RapidHITTM ID V2 Analysis

Francis Hermitte, Sylvain Hubac, Christian Siatka, Logan Privat et al.
Forensic Sciences
Forensic and Genetic Research
article

Evaluation of a Subsampling Protocol for RapidHITTM ID V2 Analysis

Francis Hermitte, Sylvain Hubac, Christian Siatka, Logan Privat, Anna Franzoni, Michele Rosso, Chloé Scherer, Marion Defontaine
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Rapid DNA systems accelerate STR profiling but often require the consumption of the entire swab, limiting confirmation testing or downstream analyses. We previously validated a simple subsampling protocol for blood swabs on the RapidHITTM ID, using a rigid subungual mini-swab (Copan Italia S.p.A). A new version of this instrument has recently been released, featuring redesigned software and consumables. The RapidINTELTM Plus sample cartridge now enables two distinct lysis/extraction protocols, expanding analytical possibilities for rich biological traces. We evaluated subsampling performance using the subungual mini-swab and microFLOQ® swabs (Copan Italia S.p.A), and assessed feasibility for both blood and buccal reference swabs. Methods: Whole blood from four donors was deposited onto regular Copan swabs (10 µL) or microFLOQ® swabs (1 µL). A comparison was performed between the direct analysis of blood swabs using a RapidHITTM ID V1 (RapidINTELTM cartridge) and a RapidHITTM ID V2 (RapidINTELTM Plus cartridge, GENERAL protocol). Subsequently, both the GENERAL and SPECIALIZED protocols were tested after subsampling from primary blood or buccal swabs dried for 24 h using either a subungual mini-swab or a microFLOQ®. Results: Blood-swab subsampling on the V2 produced usable STR profiles with both the subungual mini-swab and the microFLOQ®. The subungual mini-swab was compatible with both the GENERAL and SPECIALIZED protocols. For blood applications, microFLOQ® fiber treatment showed no inhibitory effects. Reference buccal swabs were successfully analyzed with the RapidINTELTM Plus cartridge, either directly (regular swab) or via subungual subsampling under both protocols. In contrast, in this feasibility dataset (single analysis per donor per condition), subsampling a reference swab with microFLOQ® did not yield suitable profiles for RapidINTELTM Plus analysis under the tested conditions. Conclusions: This feasibility study indicates that the subsampling strategy can be applied on the RapidHITTM ID V2, particularly using subungual mini-swabs, to retain the primary swab for potential downstream testing while maintaining usable STR profile quality for blood and buccal reference workflows under the tested conditions.

Forensic SciencesVol. 6(1)
Gendarmerie Nationale (FR), École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR), Interfaces, Confinement, Matériaux et Nanostructures (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Forensic and Genetic Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.