How Much Do You Remember When It's up to You? Measuring Memory Use Without Response Bias in Young Children

Outside the laboratory, people tend not to push working memory to its limits. Instead, we tend to capitalize on stable, external resources (e.g., assembly diagrams or shopping lists) in a dynamic, context-dependent trade-off with internal memory: we sample the environment more when remembering is "costly" (e.g., when a shopping list is difficult to remember) and remember more when sampling is costly (e.g. when the list is difficult to access). Here, we used our gamified Shopping Game paradigm to characterize this sampling-remembering trade-off in preschoolers (the youngest age at which it has been tested). In two preregistered experiments, 157 children (Exp. 1: 82 4.5-7-year-olds; Exp. 2: 75 5.5-7-year-olds, from the Northeastern US) used a touchscreen tablet to pick items from a virtual store based on a shopping list. Children could not see the list and store simultaneously, but could toggle between them. When we introduced a cost to access the list (a 4 s lag before it appeared), children accessed it less, instead opting to remember more on each trip (but still less than their maximal capacity). In Experiment 1, we determined that children begin to respond to these costs at around 5.8 years of age. In Experiment 2, we showed that children exhausted the contents of their memory on each of their visits to the store: when it's up to them, young children seem to only load up their memory with as much as they intend to use. A video abstract of this article can be viewed at https://youtu.be/ZfJkod0Vj3k. SUMMARY: Here, we used our novel, gamified 'Shopping Game' paradigm to measure naturalistic memory use in 4.5-7-year-old children. Crucially, we could contrast how much a child could remember, how much they chose to remember, and how much of what was remembered was applied. We found that children will take advantage of an external resource (a shopping list) more and remember less, as the cost to access them decreases. This cost-dependent trade-off between sampling and remembering emerges around 5.8 years of age in our task.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Developmental Science
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.70152
Primary Topic
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Much Do You Remember When It's up to You? Measuring Memory Use Without Response Bias in Young Children

Zsuzsa Káldy, Erik Blaser, Candice Koolhaas
Developmental Science
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
article

How Much Do You Remember When It's up to You? Measuring Memory Use Without Response Bias in Young Children

Zsuzsa Káldy, Erik Blaser, Candice Koolhaas
article en

Abstract

Outside the laboratory, people tend not to push working memory to its limits. Instead, we tend to capitalize on stable, external resources (e.g., assembly diagrams or shopping lists) in a dynamic, context-dependent trade-off with internal memory: we sample the environment more when remembering is "costly" (e.g., when a shopping list is difficult to remember) and remember more when sampling is costly (e.g. when the list is difficult to access). Here, we used our gamified Shopping Game paradigm to characterize this sampling-remembering trade-off in preschoolers (the youngest age at which it has been tested). In two preregistered experiments, 157 children (Exp. 1: 82 4.5-7-year-olds; Exp. 2: 75 5.5-7-year-olds, from the Northeastern US) used a touchscreen tablet to pick items from a virtual store based on a shopping list. Children could not see the list and store simultaneously, but could toggle between them. When we introduced a cost to access the list (a 4 s lag before it appeared), children accessed it less, instead opting to remember more on each trip (but still less than their maximal capacity). In Experiment 1, we determined that children begin to respond to these costs at around 5.8 years of age. In Experiment 2, we showed that children exhausted the contents of their memory on each of their visits to the store: when it's up to them, young children seem to only load up their memory with as much as they intend to use. A video abstract of this article can be viewed at https://youtu.be/ZfJkod0Vj3k. SUMMARY: Here, we used our novel, gamified 'Shopping Game' paradigm to measure naturalistic memory use in 4.5-7-year-old children. Crucially, we could contrast how much a child could remember, how much they chose to remember, and how much of what was remembered was applied. We found that children will take advantage of an external resource (a shopping list) more and remember less, as the cost to access them decreases. This cost-dependent trade-off between sampling and remembering emerges around 5.8 years of age in our task.

Developmental ScienceVol. 29(2)
University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Much Do You Remember When It's up to You? Measuring Memory Use Without Response Bias in Young Children — Zsuzsa Káldy, Erik Blaser, et al. · Developmental Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS