Enlightening: Adorno’s and Kant’s Contrasting Answers to the Question “How to Write About the Enlightenment?”

Abstract The content of Kant’s Enlightenment text has received much critical reception, but the very stance Kant takes as its author has been largely ignored. Similarly, there has been much critical discussion of Horkheimer and Adorno’s “Dialectic of Enlightenment” in terms of the theses they (purportedly) endorse, while their authorial voice has mostly received either no attention or been criticised as problematically rhetorical. In this paper, I take a different approach, focusing on the two respective writerly stances. I suggest that Kant’s text harbours an implicit epistemic authoritarianism, in contrast to the self-therapeutic stance Adorno and Horkheimer’s text exemplifies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kantian Review
Published
2026-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415425101167
Primary Topic
Critical Theory and Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enlightening: Adorno’s and Kant’s Contrasting Answers to the Question “How to Write About the Enlightenment?”

Fabian Freyenhagen
Kantian Review
Critical Theory and Philosophy
article

Enlightening: Adorno’s and Kant’s Contrasting Answers to the Question “How to Write About the Enlightenment?”

Fabian Freyenhagen
article en

Abstract

Abstract The content of Kant’s Enlightenment text has received much critical reception, but the very stance Kant takes as its author has been largely ignored. Similarly, there has been much critical discussion of Horkheimer and Adorno’s “Dialectic of Enlightenment” in terms of the theses they (purportedly) endorse, while their authorial voice has mostly received either no attention or been criticised as problematically rhetorical. In this paper, I take a different approach, focusing on the two respective writerly stances. I suggest that Kant’s text harbours an implicit epistemic authoritarianism, in contrast to the self-therapeutic stance Adorno and Horkheimer’s text exemplifies.

Kantian Review
University of Essex (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Critical Theory and Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Enlightening: Adorno’s and Kant’s Contrasting Answers to the Question “How to Write About the Enlightenment?” — Fabian Freyenhagen · Kantian Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS