Kolb learning styles in Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC): a comparative study of military learners and civilian paramedics

Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) is a widely used training framework for battlefield trauma care. Despite its growing implementation in both military and civilian contexts, data comparing learning style distributions between military and civilian populations receiving TCCC-related training remain limited. This study aimed to compare Kolb learning styles between professional soldiers receiving tactical medic training and paramedics working in prehospital emergency services. This cross-sectional descriptive study included 61 male participants: 39 military personnel undergoing a 2.5-month, 360-hour tactical combat medic course, and 22 paramedics serving as the control group. Learning styles were assessed using the validated Kolb Learning Style Inventory. Group differences were analyzed using Fisher’s exact and Mann–Whitney U test. Military participants most frequently exhibited the Converger (41.0%) and Accommodator (25.6%) styles, reflecting a preference for hands-on, action-driven learning. Paramedics, in contrast, showed higher proportions of Assimilators (31.8%) and Divergers (31.8%), favoring reflective and abstract strategies. The difference in learning style distribution between groups was statistically significant (p = 0.038). Demographic comparisons also revealed differences in age and educational background. Military trainees and civilian paramedics display different learning style profiles. These findings are descriptive and hypothesis-generating and may inform future research on TCCC educational approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Emergency Medicine
Published
2026-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-026-01509-8
Primary Topic
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kolb learning styles in Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC): a comparative study of military learners and civilian paramedics

Fatma Selman, Cem Yıldırım, Mehmet Tatlı, Ertuğ Günsoy et al.
BMC Emergency Medicine
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
article

Kolb learning styles in Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC): a comparative study of military learners and civilian paramedics

Fatma Selman, Cem Yıldırım, Mehmet Tatlı, Ertuğ Günsoy, Ahmet Aykut
article en

Abstract

Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) is a widely used training framework for battlefield trauma care. Despite its growing implementation in both military and civilian contexts, data comparing learning style distributions between military and civilian populations receiving TCCC-related training remain limited. This study aimed to compare Kolb learning styles between professional soldiers receiving tactical medic training and paramedics working in prehospital emergency services. This cross-sectional descriptive study included 61 male participants: 39 military personnel undergoing a 2.5-month, 360-hour tactical combat medic course, and 22 paramedics serving as the control group. Learning styles were assessed using the validated Kolb Learning Style Inventory. Group differences were analyzed using Fisher’s exact and Mann–Whitney U test. Military participants most frequently exhibited the Converger (41.0%) and Accommodator (25.6%) styles, reflecting a preference for hands-on, action-driven learning. Paramedics, in contrast, showed higher proportions of Assimilators (31.8%) and Divergers (31.8%), favoring reflective and abstract strategies. The difference in learning style distribution between groups was statistically significant (p = 0.038). Demographic comparisons also revealed differences in age and educational background. Military trainees and civilian paramedics display different learning style profiles. These findings are descriptive and hypothesis-generating and may inform future research on TCCC educational approaches.

BMC Emergency MedicineVol. 26(1)
Istanbul Medipol University (TR), Education Training And Research (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.