Effect of a combined lifestyle intervention on behavioural and clinical outcomes in people at above-average risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Introduction A healthy lifestyle, along with regular colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, is key to reducing the risk of colorectal neoplasia (ie, precancerous lesions and CRC). However, there is limited evidence on the effect of a combined lifestyle intervention on health outcomes. This review aimed to summarise the effect of combined lifestyle interventions on behavioural change, colorectal neoplasia risk, mortality and quality of life (QoL) in people at above-average risk of CRC due to a family history of CRC or a personal history of colorectal neoplasia. Methods and analysis This systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted according to the Cochrane guidelines. Relevant trial studies, including randomised controlled trials and non-randomised trials, will be searched across four databases: Medline/Ovid, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus. Studies that assessed the effect of at least two lifestyle interventions in people at above-average risk of CRC will be included. The primary outcome will be colorectal neoplasia risk, while behavioural change, mortality and QoL will be considered as secondary outcomes. Two independent reviewers will screen the articles, extract the data and assess the quality of included studies. The results of homogeneous studies will be synthesised through meta-analysis using a fixed-effects or random-effects model. Meta-analysis results will be reported using either relative risks or HR with 95% CIs for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences with 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Statistical heterogeneity between the studies will be evaluated using the I 2 test. PROSPERO registration number CRD420251046134.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Considerations in Medicine
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/conmed-2026-000033
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of a combined lifestyle intervention on behavioural and clinical outcomes in people at above-average risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Melkalem Mamuye Azanaw, Molla Mesele Wassie, Jean M. Winter, Meseret Derbew Molla et al.
Considerations in Medicine
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Effect of a combined lifestyle intervention on behavioural and clinical outcomes in people at above-average risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Melkalem Mamuye Azanaw, Molla Mesele Wassie, Jean M. Winter, Meseret Derbew Molla, N Bulamu, Erin L Symonds
article en

Abstract

Introduction A healthy lifestyle, along with regular colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, is key to reducing the risk of colorectal neoplasia (ie, precancerous lesions and CRC). However, there is limited evidence on the effect of a combined lifestyle intervention on health outcomes. This review aimed to summarise the effect of combined lifestyle interventions on behavioural change, colorectal neoplasia risk, mortality and quality of life (QoL) in people at above-average risk of CRC due to a family history of CRC or a personal history of colorectal neoplasia. Methods and analysis This systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted according to the Cochrane guidelines. Relevant trial studies, including randomised controlled trials and non-randomised trials, will be searched across four databases: Medline/Ovid, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus. Studies that assessed the effect of at least two lifestyle interventions in people at above-average risk of CRC will be included. The primary outcome will be colorectal neoplasia risk, while behavioural change, mortality and QoL will be considered as secondary outcomes. Two independent reviewers will screen the articles, extract the data and assess the quality of included studies. The results of homogeneous studies will be synthesised through meta-analysis using a fixed-effects or random-effects model. Meta-analysis results will be reported using either relative risks or HR with 95% CIs for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences with 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Statistical heterogeneity between the studies will be evaluated using the I 2 test. PROSPERO registration number CRD420251046134.

Considerations in MedicineVol. 4(1)
Flinders University (AU), Flinders Medical Centre (AU), Debre Tabor University (ET), University of Gondar (ET)
Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council, Cancer Council South Australia
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.