Correction to “Model‐Robust Standardization in Cluster‐Randomized Trials”

We would like to make a correction to the paper titled "Model-robust standardization in cluster-randomized trials" by Li et al.In Sections 4.4 and 4.5, the outcome-model labels in Tables 3 and4 were reported incorrectly.The correct outcome models corresponding to working models W5-W8 should be: GLM (W5), GLMM (W6), GEE-exch (W7), and GEE-ind (W8).The corrected versions of originally published Tables 3 and4 are presented below as Corrected Table 3 andCorrected Table 4, respectively.This correction only affects the labeling of the outcome models in Tables 3 and4.All numerical results, interpretations, and substantive conclusions in Sections 4.4 and 4.5, and in the rest of the paper, remain unchanged.

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics in Medicine
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70447
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correction to “Model‐Robust Standardization in Cluster‐Randomized Trials”

Statistics in Medicine
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Correction to “Model‐Robust Standardization in Cluster‐Randomized Trials”

article en

Abstract

We would like to make a correction to the paper titled "Model-robust standardization in cluster-randomized trials" by Li et al.In Sections 4.4 and 4.5, the outcome-model labels in Tables 3 and4 were reported incorrectly.The correct outcome models corresponding to working models W5-W8 should be: GLM (W5), GLMM (W6), GEE-exch (W7), and GEE-ind (W8).The corrected versions of originally published Tables 3 and4 are presented below as Corrected Table 3 andCorrected Table 4, respectively.This correction only affects the labeling of the outcome models in Tables 3 and4.All numerical results, interpretations, and substantive conclusions in Sections 4.4 and 4.5, and in the rest of the paper, remain unchanged.

Statistics in MedicineVol. 45(3-5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Correction to “Model‐Robust Standardization in Cluster‐Randomized Trials” · Statistics in Medicine (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS