A Learner-Driven Workshop to Enhance Feedback Engagement in Emergency Medicine
Thirty-one residents completed the pre-survey, and 30 completed both the post-survey and the knowledge assessment. Statistically significant improvements were observed in resident comfort for clarifying expectations (Δ = 0.67; p < 0.001), creating goals (Δ = 0.90; p < 0.001), comfort receiving feedback (Δ = 0.33; p = 0.01), seeking feedback (Δ = 0.40; p = 0.02), creating feedback action plans (Δ = 1.70; p < 0.001), reflecting on and implementing feedback (Δ = 0.40; p < 0.001), and recognizing feedback as the learner's responsibility (Δ = 0.53; p = 0.002). Perceptions of feedback's importance and impact on patient care remained high and unchanged. Knowledge retention among residents was high, with 91.1% of items (247/270) answered correctly. The strongest performance was observed in the domains of Expectations (87/90, 96.7%) and Goal Setting (88/90, 97.8%), while the Feedback Action Plan domain showed the lowest scores (73/90, 81.1%). Conclusion: A structured workshop significantly improved EM residents' comfort, knowledge, and skills in engaging with feedback. Early introduction of learner‑driven strategies may strengthen feedback culture and support professional development. This learner‑centered model represents a meaningful shift from traditional faculty‑directed feedback frameworks by placing primary ownership of the process in the hands of learners. Further research is needed to assess long‑term retention, clinical application, and the role of faculty development.
Authors
- Megan Fix (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4380-1273)
- Jeffrey Druck (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7304-0850)
- Brian Merritt
- Rowan Kelner
- Christine Raps
- Robert Stephen
- Julia Ruggieri
- Patrick Hughes
- Allison M Beaulieu
Institutions
- University of Utah (US)
- University of Utah Hospital (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cureus
- Published
- 2026-02-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.103910
- Primary Topic
- Innovations in Medical Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00