Ligand Rigidity and π-Surface Modulate Biomolecular Interactions and Cytotoxicity in Ru(II) Polypyridyl Complexes

The complexes cis-[Ru(dmbpy)2Cl(bpy)](PF6) (Rubpy) and cis-[Ru(dmbpy)2Cl(bpe)](PF6) (Rubpe) (dmbpy = 4,4′-Dimethyl-2,2′-dipyridyl, bpy= 4,4′-dipyridyl and bpe = 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane) were synthesized and spectroelectrochemically characterized. Both Ru(II) complexes exhibited absorption bands assigned to intraligand and metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) transitions, and their spectral stability in PBS buffer (pH 7.4) supports their suitability for biological studies involving biomolecules or living cells. Fluorescence quenching assays revealed strong interactions with bovine serum albumin (BSA), with binding constants (Kb) values were 2.89 × 105 M−1 for Rubpy and 1.97 × 105 M−1 for Rubpe, and a stoichiometry of one binding site per albumin molecule. DNA-binding studies demonstrated non-covalent interactions with ss-DNA, evidenced by a hyperchromic effect in the MLCT bands, suggesting a partial intercalation or groove-binding mechanism. Cellular uptake assays indicated moderate incorporation of both complexes in tumor cells, with uptake levels of 52% (Rubpy) and 47% (Rubpe) in HeLa cells, and 42% (Rubpy) and 32% (Rubpe) in MDA-MB-231 cells. Despite the similar uptake profiles, cytotoxicity assays showed that Rubpe is approximately 2.4 times more potent than Rubpy, with IC50 values of 9 μM (HeLa) and 12 μM (MDA-MB-231), compared to 22 μM and 29 μM for Rubpy, respectively. These results highlight the relevance of these Ru(II) complexes as molecular platforms for exploring structure–activity relationships in anticancer agents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Inorganics
Published
2026-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics14020063
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Metal complexes synthesis and properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ligand Rigidity and π-Surface Modulate Biomolecular Interactions and Cytotoxicity in Ru(II) Polypyridyl Complexes

Tiago A. Matias, André L.A. Parussulo, Henrique E. Toma, Ricardo Campos Lino et al.
1 citations
Inorganics
Metal complexes synthesis and properties
24.20
article

Ligand Rigidity and π-Surface Modulate Biomolecular Interactions and Cytotoxicity in Ru(II) Polypyridyl Complexes

Tiago A. Matias, André L.A. Parussulo, Henrique E. Toma, Ricardo Campos Lino, Antonio Otávio de Toledo Patrocinio, Marcos Eduardo G. Carmo, Clara Maria Faria Silva, Patrícia Alves de Matos, Tayana Mazin Tsubone, Marcelo Emílio Beletti, Robson José de Oliveira Júnior
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The complexes cis-[Ru(dmbpy)2Cl(bpy)](PF6) (Rubpy) and cis-[Ru(dmbpy)2Cl(bpe)](PF6) (Rubpe) (dmbpy = 4,4′-Dimethyl-2,2′-dipyridyl, bpy= 4,4′-dipyridyl and bpe = 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane) were synthesized and spectroelectrochemically characterized. Both Ru(II) complexes exhibited absorption bands assigned to intraligand and metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) transitions, and their spectral stability in PBS buffer (pH 7.4) supports their suitability for biological studies involving biomolecules or living cells. Fluorescence quenching assays revealed strong interactions with bovine serum albumin (BSA), with binding constants (Kb) values were 2.89 × 105 M−1 for Rubpy and 1.97 × 105 M−1 for Rubpe, and a stoichiometry of one binding site per albumin molecule. DNA-binding studies demonstrated non-covalent interactions with ss-DNA, evidenced by a hyperchromic effect in the MLCT bands, suggesting a partial intercalation or groove-binding mechanism. Cellular uptake assays indicated moderate incorporation of both complexes in tumor cells, with uptake levels of 52% (Rubpy) and 47% (Rubpe) in HeLa cells, and 42% (Rubpy) and 32% (Rubpe) in MDA-MB-231 cells. Despite the similar uptake profiles, cytotoxicity assays showed that Rubpe is approximately 2.4 times more potent than Rubpy, with IC50 values of 9 μM (HeLa) and 12 μM (MDA-MB-231), compared to 22 μM and 29 μM for Rubpy, respectively. These results highlight the relevance of these Ru(II) complexes as molecular platforms for exploring structure–activity relationships in anticancer agents.

InorganicsVol. 14(2)
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (BR), Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (BR)
L'Oreal USA, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Metal complexes synthesis and properties
24.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.