Comparative analysis of CCUS practice between China and Europe

Reducing carbon emissions has emerged as a global agreement in the past decades to collaboratively address the challenges posed by climate change. Traditionally, phasing out fossil fuels is regarded as a pivotal strategy for mitigating carbon emissions. However, carbon capture, use, and storage (CCUS) have increasingly drawn attention as a direct approach to reducing atmospheric carbon levels. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of CCUS technologies in China and Europe, with a particular focus on the China Qilu Petrochemical-Shengli Oilfield CCUS project as a representative case for China, which is compared with the Norwegian Northerns CCUS project. The comparison involves aspects such as technological path, policy support, environmental impacts, and economic benefits. Additionally, several future trends and strategic recommendations are provided for the advancement of CCUS technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IET conference proceedings.
Published
2026-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2025.3889
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of CCUS practice between China and Europe

Ruofeng Wan, Guangjie Wu, Longquan Sun, Wenbo Yao et al.
IET conference proceedings.
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
article

Comparative analysis of CCUS practice between China and Europe

Ruofeng Wan, Guangjie Wu, Longquan Sun, Wenbo Yao, Cheng Lyu
article en

Abstract

Reducing carbon emissions has emerged as a global agreement in the past decades to collaboratively address the challenges posed by climate change. Traditionally, phasing out fossil fuels is regarded as a pivotal strategy for mitigating carbon emissions. However, carbon capture, use, and storage (CCUS) have increasingly drawn attention as a direct approach to reducing atmospheric carbon levels. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of CCUS technologies in China and Europe, with a particular focus on the China Qilu Petrochemical-Shengli Oilfield CCUS project as a representative case for China, which is compared with the Norwegian Northerns CCUS project. The comparison involves aspects such as technological path, policy support, environmental impacts, and economic benefits. Additionally, several future trends and strategic recommendations are provided for the advancement of CCUS technologies.

IET conference proceedings.Vol. 2025(38)
Lingnan University (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative analysis of CCUS practice between China and Europe — Ruofeng Wan, Guangjie Wu, et al. · IET conference proceedings. (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS