Accuracy of a <scp>3D</scp> Intraoral Scanner in Endodontics

This study measured the accuracy of an intraoral scanner (Primescan, Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA) in examining endodontic access openings. The method was compared to the clinical microscope and CBCT. Primescan scanned the pulp chambers of 24 extracted molars shortly after access, and the computer-3D models were inspected to document the orifices (number; location) and chamber features (calcifications; defects originated during access; anatomical variations). Scanner agreement to identify the orifices' number and location was non-significant in relation to both the microscope and CBCT; considered, therefore, accurate. It was also accurate to show defects (bur abrasion) and/or anatomical features (isthmus) in the chamber floor, with diagnostic accuracy estimated in 87.5% (95% CI: 67.6-97.3) in relation to the microscope. Scanner diagnostic accuracy to show calcified orifices was estimated in 79.2% (95% CI: 57.8-92.9) in relation to the microscope, and 70.8% (95% CI: 48.9-87.4) in relation to the CBCT, considered, then, of moderate accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Endodontic Journal
Published
2026-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.70065
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of a 3D Intraoral Scanner in Endodontics

Renata Grazziotin, Thiago Machado Ardenghi, Diego Machado Ardenghi, Ryan Li
Australian Endodontic Journal
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Accuracy of a 3D Intraoral Scanner in Endodontics

Renata Grazziotin, Thiago Machado Ardenghi, Diego Machado Ardenghi, Ryan Li
article en

Abstract

This study measured the accuracy of an intraoral scanner (Primescan, Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA) in examining endodontic access openings. The method was compared to the clinical microscope and CBCT. Primescan scanned the pulp chambers of 24 extracted molars shortly after access, and the computer-3D models were inspected to document the orifices (number; location) and chamber features (calcifications; defects originated during access; anatomical variations). Scanner agreement to identify the orifices' number and location was non-significant in relation to both the microscope and CBCT; considered, therefore, accurate. It was also accurate to show defects (bur abrasion) and/or anatomical features (isthmus) in the chamber floor, with diagnostic accuracy estimated in 87.5% (95% CI: 67.6-97.3) in relation to the microscope. Scanner diagnostic accuracy to show calcified orifices was estimated in 79.2% (95% CI: 57.8-92.9) in relation to the microscope, and 70.8% (95% CI: 48.9-87.4) in relation to the CBCT, considered, then, of moderate accuracy.

Australian Endodontic Journal
University of British Columbia Hospital (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Accuracy of a <scp>3D</scp> Intraoral Scanner in Endodontics — Renata Grazziotin, Thiago Machado Ardenghi, et al. · Australian Endodontic Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS