A scalable matching approach for the comparison of agricultural land use maps based on corresponding field polygons

Establishing sustainable agricultural systems while ensuring food security has become a global priority. Meeting this goal requires contributions from different fields of agricultural science, many of which depend on detailed information on crops. Recent advancements in deep learning and the transnational harmonization of administrative data have led to the availability of ever-larger datasets of agricultural field polygons. These datasets, however, vary in quality and level of detail. To achieve synergies between different information sources through data fusion and to evaluate the quality of model outputs, it is essential to efficiently identify correspondences in spatially overlapping datasets. We address this challenge by leveraging a state-of-the-art matching algorithm that we adapt by redesigning its connected-component decomposition to handle large-scale datasets of agricultural field polygons. We demonstrate the algorithm’s suitability through two case studies. First, we show how automatically delineated field polygons can be validated against ground truth in terms of their spatial quality. Second, we explore how two established reference datasets align both thematically and spatially. We discuss the dataset comparisons using different evaluation metrics and provide an interactive map viewer that enables the exploration of spatial patterns of the datasets’ alignment by visualizing matching qualities in the geographic context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Digital Earth
Published
2026-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2026.2632420
Primary Topic
Soil and Land Suitability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A scalable matching approach for the comparison of agricultural land use maps based on corresponding field polygons

Jan‐Henrik Haunert, Sven Gedicke, Alexander Naumann
International Journal of Digital Earth
Soil and Land Suitability Analysis
article

A scalable matching approach for the comparison of agricultural land use maps based on corresponding field polygons

Jan‐Henrik Haunert, Sven Gedicke, Alexander Naumann
article en

Abstract

Establishing sustainable agricultural systems while ensuring food security has become a global priority. Meeting this goal requires contributions from different fields of agricultural science, many of which depend on detailed information on crops. Recent advancements in deep learning and the transnational harmonization of administrative data have led to the availability of ever-larger datasets of agricultural field polygons. These datasets, however, vary in quality and level of detail. To achieve synergies between different information sources through data fusion and to evaluate the quality of model outputs, it is essential to efficiently identify correspondences in spatially overlapping datasets. We address this challenge by leveraging a state-of-the-art matching algorithm that we adapt by redesigning its connected-component decomposition to handle large-scale datasets of agricultural field polygons. We demonstrate the algorithm’s suitability through two case studies. First, we show how automatically delineated field polygons can be validated against ground truth in terms of their spatial quality. Second, we explore how two established reference datasets align both thematically and spatially. We discuss the dataset comparisons using different evaluation metrics and provide an interactive map viewer that enables the exploration of spatial patterns of the datasets’ alignment by visualizing matching qualities in the geographic context.

International Journal of Digital EarthVol. 19(1)
GeoInformation (United Kingdom) (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Soil and Land Suitability Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.