A Multidimensional Narrative Review of Disparities in Hospice Care Use

PurposeHospice care is a patient- and family-centered approach to end-of-life care that prioritizes comfort, symptom management, and psychosocial support while foregoing curative treatment. Hospice care improves quality of life and care at the end of life. Despite its benefits, hospice remains underutilized by racially and ethnically diverse people, sexual and gender minorities, and socioeconomically marginalized populations.FindingsGuided by the Social Ecological Model, the objectives of this narrative review are to (a) discuss disparities in hospice care use, (b) explore multidimensional levels and factors contributing to such disparities, and (c) outline implications and imperatives for improving access to and use of hospice care. This review revealed that hospice care disparities are shaped by interacting factors across societal, structural, healthcare system, interpersonal, and individual levels. Historical context, policy design, geographic and socioeconomic constraints, clinician communication, and cultural beliefs collectively influence patterns of access, timing, and utilization of hospice care. System-level solutions include integrating hospice referrals into routine care workflows, improving hospice-related policies, strengthening partnerships with community organizations, and transitional care research. Clinicians are uniquely positioned to identify care preferences, advocate for timely referrals and support the hospice transition, and build trust with patients and families at the end of life.ConclusionsEfforts across clinical settings, policy, and research are critical to improving hospice care use, and ensuring that all seriously ill individuals benefit from goal-concordant, high-quality hospice care. Reducing hospice care disparities will require coordinated, multilevel interventions that address policy and healthcare system factors while strengthening hospice-related communication and care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Published
2026-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091261428463
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Multidimensional Narrative Review of Disparities in Hospice Care Use

Laura Moreines, Komal Patel Murali, Leah V. Estrada, G. Wang et al.
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

A Multidimensional Narrative Review of Disparities in Hospice Care Use

Laura Moreines, Komal Patel Murali, Leah V. Estrada, G. Wang, Daniella Torres, Karen Bullock, Abraham A. Brody
article en

Abstract

PurposeHospice care is a patient- and family-centered approach to end-of-life care that prioritizes comfort, symptom management, and psychosocial support while foregoing curative treatment. Hospice care improves quality of life and care at the end of life. Despite its benefits, hospice remains underutilized by racially and ethnically diverse people, sexual and gender minorities, and socioeconomically marginalized populations.FindingsGuided by the Social Ecological Model, the objectives of this narrative review are to (a) discuss disparities in hospice care use, (b) explore multidimensional levels and factors contributing to such disparities, and (c) outline implications and imperatives for improving access to and use of hospice care. This review revealed that hospice care disparities are shaped by interacting factors across societal, structural, healthcare system, interpersonal, and individual levels. Historical context, policy design, geographic and socioeconomic constraints, clinician communication, and cultural beliefs collectively influence patterns of access, timing, and utilization of hospice care. System-level solutions include integrating hospice referrals into routine care workflows, improving hospice-related policies, strengthening partnerships with community organizations, and transitional care research. Clinicians are uniquely positioned to identify care preferences, advocate for timely referrals and support the hospice transition, and build trust with patients and families at the end of life.ConclusionsEfforts across clinical settings, policy, and research are critical to improving hospice care use, and ensuring that all seriously ill individuals benefit from goal-concordant, high-quality hospice care. Reducing hospice care disparities will require coordinated, multilevel interventions that address policy and healthcare system factors while strengthening hospice-related communication and care.

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Boston College (US), KES College (CY), Meyer (China) (CN), New York University (US), School of Visual Arts (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.