On the Pragmatics of Hateful Questions

While direct assertions of hateful propositions by means of declarative utterances may be the examples of hate speech that come to mind most readily, hate speech is not restricted to such utterances. To contribute to the understanding of non-declarative types of hate speech this paper discusses hateful questions. The paper examines how various types of written utterances with interrogative marking may be used to communicate hateful content by exploiting pragmatic dynamics. A corpus harvested from the comment threads of the Danish pages of a global social media platform serves as the source of empirical examples. Through analysis of a broad variety of question types the paper shows that a wide range of different pragmatic dynamics contribute to how questions communicate hateful content. Hateful questions may communicate derogatory content by virtue of presuppositions or implicatures but may also be categorized based on various other characteristic properties, e.g., as questions with slurs or biased questions. Understanding fully how questions may be used for hate speech requires an understanding of the distinct pragmatic properties of all these different question types.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Topoi
Published
2026-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-026-10369-7
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Pragmatics of Hateful Questions

Topoi
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
article

On the Pragmatics of Hateful Questions

article en

Abstract

While direct assertions of hateful propositions by means of declarative utterances may be the examples of hate speech that come to mind most readily, hate speech is not restricted to such utterances. To contribute to the understanding of non-declarative types of hate speech this paper discusses hateful questions. The paper examines how various types of written utterances with interrogative marking may be used to communicate hateful content by exploiting pragmatic dynamics. A corpus harvested from the comment threads of the Danish pages of a global social media platform serves as the source of empirical examples. Through analysis of a broad variety of question types the paper shows that a wide range of different pragmatic dynamics contribute to how questions communicate hateful content. Hateful questions may communicate derogatory content by virtue of presuppositions or implicatures but may also be categorized based on various other characteristic properties, e.g., as questions with slurs or biased questions. Understanding fully how questions may be used for hate speech requires an understanding of the distinct pragmatic properties of all these different question types.

Topoi
University College Copenhagen (DK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.