Single‐Sided: Associations Between Social Network Opinions and Singlehood Among Heterosexual and Sexually Diverse Individuals

ABSTRACT Although romantic relationships are often idealized, many individuals find satisfaction in being single. Evidence shows social networks influence commitment within romantic relationships—with network approval being a boon, and disapproval a detractor—but whether this social network effect extends to commitment to being single remains unclear. This study examined whether perceived approval from parents and friends predicts commitment to singlehood and fear of being single, and if associations differ according to one's sexual orientation. Single US adults ( N = 501, 47% women, 50% White) identifying as heterosexual ( n = 256) and sexually diverse (e.g., gay, pansexual; n = 245) completed an online survey assessing aspects of singlehood. Network approval—especially from friends—is related to higher commitment and lower fear. After including covariates, approval was no longer associated with commitment or fear in either group. Combining heterosexual and sexually diverse participants, parent and friend approval remained significant predictors of lower fear, even after covariates were included. Subjective norms, calculated as opinions weighted by motivation to comply, showed little consistency in their associations. Approval from friends appears especially important for sexually diverse singles, who may rely more on their chosen family for social support. Findings extend understanding of the nuanced nature of the social network effect when applied to singlehood.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personal Relationships
Published
2026-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.70055
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
60.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Single‐Sided: Associations Between Social Network Opinions and Singlehood Among Heterosexual and Sexually Diverse Individuals

Sydney G. Wicks, H. Colleen Sinclair
1 citations
Personal Relationships
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
60.58
article

Single‐Sided: Associations Between Social Network Opinions and Singlehood Among Heterosexual and Sexually Diverse Individuals

Sydney G. Wicks, H. Colleen Sinclair
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although romantic relationships are often idealized, many individuals find satisfaction in being single. Evidence shows social networks influence commitment within romantic relationships—with network approval being a boon, and disapproval a detractor—but whether this social network effect extends to commitment to being single remains unclear. This study examined whether perceived approval from parents and friends predicts commitment to singlehood and fear of being single, and if associations differ according to one's sexual orientation. Single US adults ( N = 501, 47% women, 50% White) identifying as heterosexual ( n = 256) and sexually diverse (e.g., gay, pansexual; n = 245) completed an online survey assessing aspects of singlehood. Network approval—especially from friends—is related to higher commitment and lower fear. After including covariates, approval was no longer associated with commitment or fear in either group. Combining heterosexual and sexually diverse participants, parent and friend approval remained significant predictors of lower fear, even after covariates were included. Subjective norms, calculated as opinions weighted by motivation to comply, showed little consistency in their associations. Approval from friends appears especially important for sexually diverse singles, who may rely more on their chosen family for social support. Findings extend understanding of the nuanced nature of the social network effect when applied to singlehood.

Personal RelationshipsVol. 33(1)
Louisiana State University (US), University of Mississippi (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
60.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.