Indirect protection and long-term effectiveness of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine: a stepped-wedge randomised trial in Serrana, Brazil

Currently approved vaccines have shown wide ranges of estimated efficacy. Despite the well-known benefits of inactivated virus vaccines, little information on their effectiveness has been robustly provided to monitor their specific impact. A stepped-wedge trial is an approach for assessing vaccine effectiveness and indirect protection in the real world. By the end of the study, all participants can receive the intervention, eliminating the ethical dilemma of placebo, especially during a pandemic. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of an inactivated COVID-19 vaccine in a massive urban population during the uncontrolled COVID-19 epidemic. We evaluated the long-term vaccine effectiveness (VE) of CoronaVac in Serrana, Brazil, using a stepped-wedge randomised trial. An indirect effect was also inferred from the temporal association between increasing vaccine coverage and the concurrent decline in SARS-CoV-2 incidence among participants who were not yet fully vaccinated. The city was divided into 25 subareas, clustered into four groups, and randomised to receive CoronaVac in a two-dose scheme. After 6 months, a booster dose was offered by the Brazilian Immunization Program. Participants were followed for one year, divided into four periods: February-May 2021; May-August 2021; August-November 2021; November 2021-February 2022. Vaccination occurred between February 14 and April 11, 2021. Up to 27,390 participants received the CoronaVac first dose, corresponding to 82.8% of the adult urban population. In the 1<sup>st</sup> period, overall VE was 52.8% (95% CI, 44.7 to 59.7) for preventing symptomatic COVID-19 and direct VE was 81.6% (95% CI, 76.4 to 85.6). When approximately 50% of the adult population was fully vaccinated, a reduction in symptomatic COVID-19 was also observed among participants who were not yet fully vaccinated, suggesting an indirect protective effect. Two-dose VE for COVID-19-related hospitalisation and death was 89.2% (95% CI, 68.1 to 96.3), 86.8% (95% CI, 72.2 to 93.7), 85.2% (95% CI, 66.1 to 93.6), 80.4% (95% CI, 47.6 to 92.7) in each period, respectively. The booster dose increased VE to 94.9% (95% CI, 59.1 to 99.4) and 84.1% (95% CI, 64.1 to 92.9) in the 3<sup>rd</sup> and 4<sup>th</sup> periods, respectively. CoronaVac induced long-term protection for severe cases. Unvaccinated individuals benefited from high vaccine coverage levels.Trial registration: https://ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04747821).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37815-1
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Indirect protection and long-term effectiveness of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine: a stepped-wedge randomised trial in Serrana, Brazil

Lucas Bassolli de Oliveira Alves, Gustavo Jardim Volpe, C. Dias, Dimas Tadeu Covas et al.
Scientific Reports
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Indirect protection and long-term effectiveness of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine: a stepped-wedge randomised trial in Serrana, Brazil

Lucas Bassolli de Oliveira Alves, Gustavo Jardim Volpe, C. Dias, Dimas Tadeu Covas, Bárbara Marques Coutinho, Glenda R. Moraes, Ricardo Palácios, Fernanda Castro Boulos, João Ítalo Dias França, Jorge Tenorio, Eolo Morandi, Bruno Belmonte Martinelli Gomes, Lucas Ragiotto, Natasha Nicos Ferreira, Patricia Emília Braga, Pedro Manoel Marques Garibaldi, Rodrigo Tocantins Calado, Simone Kashima Haddad, Benedito Antonio Lopes Fonseca, Marcos Alves de Lima, Marcos Carvalho Borges, Erique Jose Farias Peixoto de Miranda, Monica Tilli Reis Pessoa Conde, Sandra Coccuzo Sampaio, Maria Aparecida Alves Leite dos Santos Almeida
article en

Abstract

Currently approved vaccines have shown wide ranges of estimated efficacy. Despite the well-known benefits of inactivated virus vaccines, little information on their effectiveness has been robustly provided to monitor their specific impact. A stepped-wedge trial is an approach for assessing vaccine effectiveness and indirect protection in the real world. By the end of the study, all participants can receive the intervention, eliminating the ethical dilemma of placebo, especially during a pandemic. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of an inactivated COVID-19 vaccine in a massive urban population during the uncontrolled COVID-19 epidemic. We evaluated the long-term vaccine effectiveness (VE) of CoronaVac in Serrana, Brazil, using a stepped-wedge randomised trial. An indirect effect was also inferred from the temporal association between increasing vaccine coverage and the concurrent decline in SARS-CoV-2 incidence among participants who were not yet fully vaccinated. The city was divided into 25 subareas, clustered into four groups, and randomised to receive CoronaVac in a two-dose scheme. After 6 months, a booster dose was offered by the Brazilian Immunization Program. Participants were followed for one year, divided into four periods: February-May 2021; May-August 2021; August-November 2021; November 2021-February 2022. Vaccination occurred between February 14 and April 11, 2021. Up to 27,390 participants received the CoronaVac first dose, corresponding to 82.8% of the adult urban population. In the 1<sup>st</sup> period, overall VE was 52.8% (95% CI, 44.7 to 59.7) for preventing symptomatic COVID-19 and direct VE was 81.6% (95% CI, 76.4 to 85.6). When approximately 50% of the adult population was fully vaccinated, a reduction in symptomatic COVID-19 was also observed among participants who were not yet fully vaccinated, suggesting an indirect protective effect. Two-dose VE for COVID-19-related hospitalisation and death was 89.2% (95% CI, 68.1 to 96.3), 86.8% (95% CI, 72.2 to 93.7), 85.2% (95% CI, 66.1 to 93.6), 80.4% (95% CI, 47.6 to 92.7) in each period, respectively. The booster dose increased VE to 94.9% (95% CI, 59.1 to 99.4) and 84.1% (95% CI, 64.1 to 92.9) in the 3<sup>rd</sup> and 4<sup>th</sup> periods, respectively. CoronaVac induced long-term protection for severe cases. Unvaccinated individuals benefited from high vaccine coverage levels.Trial registration: https://ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04747821).

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Instituto Butantan (BR), Universidade São Marcos (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Fundação Butantan
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.