Impact of non-standardized reporting on reproducibility, usability, and integration in nasopharyngeal metagenomic research: a systematic review

The findings demonstrate that inadequate reporting standards substantially impair the reproducibility, reuse, and integration of nasopharyngeal metagenomic data. The observed methodological and metadata inconsistencies limit the reliability of downstream analyses and cross-study comparisons. Standardized reporting guidelines are urgently needed to improve transparency, ensure reproducibility, and enhance the integrative potential of nasopharyngeal microbiome research. Adoption of comprehensive and consistent reporting practices would significantly strengthen the scientific rigor and utility of metagenomic studies in this field.