Misrepresentation of nonsignificant results: reporting pitfalls in urology randomised trials

The datasets used during the current study are available to bona fide researchers from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Urology
Published
2026-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.70139
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
28.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Misrepresentation of nonsignificant results: reporting pitfalls in urology randomised trials

Amin Sharifan
1 citations
British Journal of Urology
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
28.09
article

Misrepresentation of nonsignificant results: reporting pitfalls in urology randomised trials

Amin Sharifan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The datasets used during the current study are available to bona fide researchers from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

British Journal of Urology
Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
28.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.