Evidence for the incompatibility of smoothed particle hydrodynamics and eddy viscosity models for large eddy simulations

In this work, we will present evidence for the incompatibility of smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) methods and eddy viscosity models. Taking a coarse-graining perspective, we physically argue that SPH methods operate intrinsically as Lagrangian large eddy simulations for turbulent flows with strongly overlapping discretisation elements. However, these overlapping elements in combination with numerical errors cause a significant amount of implicit subfilter stresses (SFS). Considering a Taylor–Green flow at $Re=10^4$ , the SFS will be shown to be relevant where turbulent fluctuations are created, explaining why turbulent flows are challenging even for current SPH methods. Although one might hope to mitigate the implicit SFS using eddy viscosity models, we show a degradation of the turbulent transition process, which is rooted in the non-locality of these methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Published
2026-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2026.11179
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence for the incompatibility of smoothed particle hydrodynamics and eddy viscosity models for large eddy simulations

Niklas Bürkle, Max Okraschevski, Rainer Koch, Markus Wicker et al.
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
article

Evidence for the incompatibility of smoothed particle hydrodynamics and eddy viscosity models for large eddy simulations

Niklas Bürkle, Max Okraschevski, Rainer Koch, Markus Wicker, Hans-Joerg Bauer
article en

Abstract

In this work, we will present evidence for the incompatibility of smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) methods and eddy viscosity models. Taking a coarse-graining perspective, we physically argue that SPH methods operate intrinsically as Lagrangian large eddy simulations for turbulent flows with strongly overlapping discretisation elements. However, these overlapping elements in combination with numerical errors cause a significant amount of implicit subfilter stresses (SFS). Considering a Taylor–Green flow at $Re=10^4$ , the SFS will be shown to be relevant where turbulent fluctuations are created, explaining why turbulent flows are challenging even for current SPH methods. Although one might hope to mitigate the implicit SFS using eddy viscosity models, we show a degradation of the turbulent transition process, which is rooted in the non-locality of these methods.

Journal of Fluid MechanicsVol. 1029
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Institute of Engineering (NP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evidence for the incompatibility of smoothed particle hydrodynamics and eddy viscosity models for large eddy simulations — Niklas Bürkle, Max Okraschevski, et al. · Journal of Fluid Mechanics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS