Factors influencing the invitation for national squad selection in youth basketball: The role of relative age, maturity, and birthplace

This study examined within-group factors associated with youth basketball players invited to national squad selection camps within Basketball England's talent identification and development system. Data from 253 players (140 males, 113 females) were analysed for relative age, biological maturity, anthropometric characteristics, playing position, and region of birth. A significant Relative Age Effect was evident in both sexes, with an overrepresentation of players born in the first two quarters of the selection year (males: χ<sup>2</sup> (3) = 27.07, p < .001; females: χ<sup>2</sup> (3) = 9.47, <i>p</i> = .024). However, there were no significant differences in maturity timing or anthropometric characteristics by birth quarter, suggesting prior filtering of later-maturing players before national camp selection. Regional differences in height and mass were significant in males (height: F(8,125) = 2.34, <i>p</i> = .022; mass: F(8,125) = 2.31, <i>p</i> = .024). Guards were the most frequently selected playing position in both sexes (males: χ<sup>2</sup> (3) = 23.37, <i>p</i> < .001; females: χ<sup>2</sup> (3) = 33.31, <i>p</i> < .001). These findings highlight the multifactorial nature of selection influences within TID systems and suggest that regional context and population concentration may influence access to national pathways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2026.2632498
Primary Topic
Sport Psychology and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors influencing the invitation for national squad selection in youth basketball: The role of relative age, maturity, and birthplace

Andy Howse, Jorge Arede, Thomas Gee, Mark David Williams et al.
Journal of Sports Sciences
Sport Psychology and Performance
article

Factors influencing the invitation for national squad selection in youth basketball: The role of relative age, maturity, and birthplace

Andy Howse, Jorge Arede, Thomas Gee, Mark David Williams, Samuel Messam, Jason Moran
article en

Abstract

This study examined within-group factors associated with youth basketball players invited to national squad selection camps within Basketball England's talent identification and development system. Data from 253 players (140 males, 113 females) were analysed for relative age, biological maturity, anthropometric characteristics, playing position, and region of birth. A significant Relative Age Effect was evident in both sexes, with an overrepresentation of players born in the first two quarters of the selection year (males: χ<sup>2</sup> (3) = 27.07, p < .001; females: χ<sup>2</sup> (3) = 9.47, <i>p</i> = .024). However, there were no significant differences in maturity timing or anthropometric characteristics by birth quarter, suggesting prior filtering of later-maturing players before national camp selection. Regional differences in height and mass were significant in males (height: F(8,125) = 2.34, <i>p</i> = .022; mass: F(8,125) = 2.31, <i>p</i> = .024). Guards were the most frequently selected playing position in both sexes (males: χ<sup>2</sup> (3) = 23.37, <i>p</i> < .001; females: χ<sup>2</sup> (3) = 33.31, <i>p</i> < .001). These findings highlight the multifactorial nature of selection influences within TID systems and suggest that regional context and population concentration may influence access to national pathways.

Journal of Sports SciencesVol. 44(8)
University of Essex (GB), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (PT), National Wheelchair Basketball Association (US), Anglia Ruskin University (GB), University of Lincoln (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Sport Psychology and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.